VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

* WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON *

NO ADVICE

Monday, December 29, 2025

Stock Comparison

FANUC CORPORATION vs Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

FANUC CORPORATION

6954 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$35.8B
SectorIndustrials
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
76/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into FANUC CORPORATION's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6954 analysis

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft

RHM · Xetra

Market cap (USD)$83.3B
SectorIndustrials
CountryDE
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
71/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View RHM analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: FANUC CORPORATION leads (76 / 100 vs 71 / 100 for Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft).
  • Segment focus: FANUC CORPORATION has 4 segments (41.3% in Industrial Robots (ROBOT) - robot systems and controllers); Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft has 4 segments (36.7% in Vehicle Systems).
  • Moat breadth: FANUC CORPORATION has 6 moat types across 3 domains; Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft has 6 across 3.

Primary market context

FANUC CORPORATION

Industrial Robots (ROBOT) - robot systems and controllers

Market

Industrial robot systems for welding, handling, assembly, painting, machine tending, etc.

Geography

Global

Customer

Manufacturers (automotive, electronics, general industry)

Role

Robot OEM (hardware + controllers)

Revenue share

41.3%

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft

Vehicle Systems

Market

Armored and tactical wheeled/tracked military vehicles

Geography

Global (Europe/NATO weighted)

Customer

Government / military

Revenue share

36.7%

Side-by-side metrics

FANUC CORPORATION
Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft
Ticker / Exchange
6954 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
RHM - Xetra
Market cap (USD)
$35.8B
$83.3B
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
HQ country
JP
DE
Primary segment
Industrial Robots (ROBOT) - robot systems and controllers
Vehicle Systems
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
12%-15% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
76 / 100
71 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Supply, Demand
Legal, Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Capacity Moat

FANUC CORPORATION strengths

De Facto StandardService Field NetworkEcosystem ComplementsBrand TrustInstalled Base Consumables

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft strengths

Government Contracting RelationshipsDesign In QualificationSupply Chain ControlLong Term ContractsDistribution Control

Segment mix

FANUC CORPORATION segments

Full profile >

Factory Automation (FA) - CNC, servos, lasers

Oligopoly

24.4%

Industrial Robots (ROBOT) - robot systems and controllers

Oligopoly

41.3%

ROBOMACHINE - ROBODRILL, ROBOSHOT, ROBOCUT

Competitive

17.3%

Service - parts, maintenance, and customer support

Quasi-Monopoly

17%

Rheinmetall Aktiengesellschaft segments

Full profile >

Vehicle Systems

Oligopoly

36.7%

Weapon and Ammunition

Oligopoly

26.9%

Electronic Solutions

Oligopoly

16.7%

Power Systems (civilian; planned divestiture)

Competitive

19.7%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.