VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV vs Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

ABI · Euronext Brussels

Market cap (USD)$115.5B
SectorConsumer
CountryBE
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ABI analysis

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

CFR · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CFR analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA leads (84 / 100 vs 75 / 100 for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV).
  • Segment focus: Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has 6 segments (28.6% in Middle Americas); Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 3 segments (71.6% in Jewellery Maisons).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has 5 moat types across 3 domains; Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 4 across 2.

Primary market context

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Middle Americas

Market

Beer and malt-based beverages (plus growing no-alcohol and Beyond Beer)

Geography

Mexico, Central America, and Caribbean (AB InBev reporting segment)

Customer

Retailers and on-premise outlets

Role

Brewer / brand owner + route-to-market operator

Revenue share

28.6%

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Jewellery Maisons

Market

Luxury jewellery (branded fine jewellery & high jewellery)

Geography

Global

Customer

Affluent and high-net-worth consumers

Role

Brand owner, manufacturer and direct-to-client retailer

Revenue share

71.6%

Side-by-side metrics

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA
Ticker / Exchange
ABI - Euronext Brussels
CFR - SIX Swiss Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$115.5B
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Consumer
HQ country
BE
CH
Primary segment
Middle Americas
Jewellery Maisons
Market structure
Duopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
30%-55% (implied)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
75 / 100
84 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply, Network
Demand, Supply
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustDistribution Control

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV strengths

Scale Economies Unit CostData Workflow LockinTwo Sided Network

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleReputation Reviews

Segment mix

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV segments

Full profile >

North America

Oligopoly

24.5%

Middle Americas

Duopoly

28.6%

South America

Oligopoly

20.8%

EMEA

Oligopoly

15.1%

Asia Pacific

Competitive

10.4%

Global Export & Holding Companies

Competitive

0.7%

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA segments

Full profile >

Jewellery Maisons

Oligopoly

71.6%

Specialist Watchmakers

Oligopoly

15.3%

Other (Fashion & Accessories, Watchfinder, ancillary)

Competitive

13%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.