VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Stock Comparison

Alcon Inc. vs KONE Oyj

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Alcon Inc.

ALC · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$39.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorHealthcare
Industry
CountryCH
Data as of2026-01-10
Moat score
71/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Alcon Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View ALC analysis

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$32.1B
Gross margin (TTM)14%
Operating margin (TTM)11.4%
Net margin (TTM)8.5%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Machinery
CountryFI
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KONE Oyj's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KNEBV analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Alcon Inc. leads (71 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for KONE Oyj).
  • Segment focus: Alcon Inc. has 2 segments (56% in Surgical); KONE Oyj has 3 segments (40.6% in New Building Solutions).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: Alcon Inc. has 7 moat types across 3 domains; KONE Oyj has 8 across 4.

Primary market context

Alcon Inc.

Surgical

Market

Ophthalmic surgical devices (implantables, consumables, equipment) and related service/training

Geography

Global

Customer

Ophthalmic surgeons, hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, group purchasing organizations

Role

Medical device OEM with direct service, clinical support, and training

Revenue share

56%

KONE Oyj

New Building Solutions

Market

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Geography

Global

Customer

Property developers and general contractors

Role

OEM + project installation

Revenue share

40.6%

Side-by-side metrics

Alcon Inc.
KONE Oyj
Ticker / Exchange
ALC - New York Stock Exchange
KNEBV - Nasdaq Helsinki
Market cap (USD)
$39.8B
$32.1B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
14%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
11.4%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
8.5%
Sector
Healthcare
Industrials
Industry
n/a
Industrial - Machinery
HQ country
CH
FI
Primary segment
Surgical
New Building Solutions
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
40%-46% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Weak
Moat score
71 / 100
63 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply, Legal
Supply, Financial, Demand, Legal
Last update
2026-01-10
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Installed Base ConsumablesService Field NetworkCompliance AdvantageCapex Knowhow Scale

Alcon Inc. strengths

Suite BundlingBrand TrustProcurement Inertia

KONE Oyj strengths

Negative Working CapitalSwitching Costs GeneralData Workflow LockinOperational Excellence

Segment mix

Alcon Inc. segments

Full profile >

Surgical

Oligopoly

56%

Vision Care

Oligopoly

44%

KONE Oyj segments

Full profile >

New Building Solutions

Oligopoly

40.6%

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Competitive

40.6%

Modernization

Competitive

18.8%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.