VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Stock Comparison

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA vs Moncler S.p.A.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

CFR · SIX Swiss Exchange

Market cap (USD)$100B
Gross margin (TTM)66.8%
Operating margin (TTM)21.3%
Net margin (TTM)14.8%
SectorConsumer
IndustryLuxury Goods
CountryCH
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CFR analysis

Moncler S.p.A.

MONC · Euronext Milan

Market cap (USD)$14.8B
Gross margin (TTM)76.4%
Operating margin (TTM)29.4%
Net margin (TTM)20.4%
SectorConsumer
IndustryApparel - Manufacturers
CountryIT
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Moncler S.p.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View MONC analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA leads (84 / 100 vs 69 / 100 for Moncler S.p.A.).
  • Segment focus: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 3 segments (71.6% in Jewellery Maisons); Moncler S.p.A. has 2 segments (87.1% in Moncler brand).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Competitive. Pricing power: Strong vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Moncler S.p.A. has 3 across 3.

Primary market context

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA

Jewellery Maisons

Market

Luxury jewellery (branded fine jewellery & high jewellery)

Geography

Global

Customer

Affluent and high-net-worth consumers

Role

Brand owner, manufacturer and direct-to-client retailer

Revenue share

71.6%

Moncler S.p.A.

Moncler brand

Market

Luxury outerwear and apparel (down jackets, ready-to-wear, accessories)

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers

Role

Branded apparel company (design/marketing; DTC + wholesale distribution)

Revenue share

87.1%

Side-by-side metrics

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA
Moncler S.p.A.
Ticker / Exchange
CFR - SIX Swiss Exchange
MONC - Euronext Milan
Market cap (USD)
$100B
$14.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
66.8%
76.4%
Operating margin (TTM)
21.3%
29.4%
Net margin (TTM)
14.8%
20.4%
Sector
Consumer
Consumer
Industry
Luxury Goods
Apparel - Manufacturers
HQ country
CH
IT
Primary segment
Jewellery Maisons
Moncler brand
Market structure
Oligopoly
Competitive
Market share
30%-55% (implied)
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
84 / 100
69 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply, Legal
Last update
2025-12-30
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustDistribution Control

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleReputation Reviews

Moncler S.p.A. strengths

IP Choke Point

Segment mix

Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA segments

Full profile >

Jewellery Maisons

Oligopoly

71.6%

Specialist Watchmakers

Oligopoly

15.3%

Other (Fashion & Accessories, Watchfinder, ancillary)

Competitive

13%

Moncler S.p.A. segments

Full profile >

Moncler brand

Competitive

87.1%

Stone Island brand

Competitive

12.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.