VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Stock Comparison

Dino Polska S.A. vs Evolution AB

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Dino Polska S.A.

DNP · Warsaw Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$3.7B
Gross margin (TTM)26.1%
Operating margin (TTM)272.7%
Net margin (TTM)261.5%
SectorConsumer
IndustryAsset Management - Income
CountryPL
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
66/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Dino Polska S.A.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DNP analysis

Evolution AB

EVO · Nasdaq Stockholm

Market cap (USD)$126.3B
Gross margin (TTM)100%
Operating margin (TTM)60.8%
Net margin (TTM)52%
SectorConsumer
IndustryGambling, Resorts & Casinos
CountrySE
Data as of2025-12-26
Moat score
94/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Evolution AB's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View EVO analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Evolution AB leads (94 / 100 vs 66 / 100 for Dino Polska S.A.).
  • Segment focus: Dino Polska S.A. has 1 segment (100% in Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)); Evolution AB has 2 segments (86.1% in Live Casino).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Dino Polska S.A. has 5 moat types across 2 domains; Evolution AB has 4 across 3.

Primary market context

Dino Polska S.A.

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Market

Retail grocery (mid-sized proximity supermarkets)

Geography

Poland

Customer

Households / consumers

Role

Brick-and-mortar grocery retailer

Revenue share

100%

Evolution AB

Live Casino

Market

B2B supply of online live casino games (live dealer & game shows)

Geography

Regulated jurisdictions (global; UK data point for concentration)

Customer

Online gambling operators (B2C)

Role

B2B content & platform supplier

Revenue share

86.1%

Side-by-side metrics

Dino Polska S.A.
Evolution AB
Ticker / Exchange
DNP - Warsaw Stock Exchange
EVO - Nasdaq Stockholm
Market cap (USD)
$3.7B
$126.3B
Gross margin (TTM)
26.1%
100%
Operating margin (TTM)
272.7%
60.8%
Net margin (TTM)
261.5%
52%
Sector
Consumer
Consumer
Industry
Asset Management - Income
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
HQ country
PL
SE
Primary segment
Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)
Live Casino
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
7%-9% (reported)
50%-60% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
5,050
Pricing power
Weak
Strong
Moat score
66 / 100
94 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand
Supply, Legal, Demand
Last update
2026-01-05
2025-12-26

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Dino Polska S.A. strengths

Physical Network DensityHabit DefaultSupply Chain ControlOperational ExcellenceScale Economies Unit Cost

Evolution AB strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleCompliance AdvantageSuite BundlingIP Choke Point

Segment mix

Dino Polska S.A. segments

Full profile >

Proximity grocery retail (Dino stores)

Oligopoly

100%

Evolution AB segments

Full profile >

Live Casino

Oligopoly

86.1%

RNG / Slots & Digital Casino Games

Competitive

13.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.