VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Stock Comparison

BRP Inc. vs LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

BRP Inc.

DOO · Toronto Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryCA
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
74/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into BRP Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View DOO analysis

LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE

MC · Euronext Paris

Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryFR
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View MC analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE leads (80 / 100 vs 74 / 100 for BRP Inc.).
  • Segment focus: BRP Inc. has 4 segments (55% in Powersports - Year-Round Products); LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has 5 segments (48.5% in Fashion and Leather Goods).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Moderate vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: BRP Inc. has 4 moat types across 2 domains; LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has 9 across 4.

Primary market context

BRP Inc.

Powersports - Year-Round Products

Market

ATV and recreational/utility side-by-side vehicles (SSV/UTV); 3-wheeled on-road vehicles

Geography

Global (heavy North America exposure)

Customer

Consumers and utility/commercial users

Role

OEM

Revenue share

55%

LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE

Fashion and Leather Goods

Market

Luxury fashion and leather goods

Geography

Global

Customer

Consumers via directly operated retail; selective wholesale

Role

Brand owner / design house / manufacturer / retailer

Revenue share

48.5%

Side-by-side metrics

BRP Inc.
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
Ticker / Exchange
DOO - Toronto Stock Exchange
MC - Euronext Paris
Market cap (USD)
n/a
n/a
Sector
Consumer
Consumer
HQ country
CA
FR
Primary segment
Powersports - Year-Round Products
Fashion and Leather Goods
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Strong
Moat score
74 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Supply, Demand, Network, Legal
Last update
2025-12-30
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustDistribution Control

BRP Inc. strengths

Installed Base ConsumablesDesign In Qualification

LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE strengths

Capex Knowhow ScaleGeographic NaturalKeystone ComponentService Field NetworkTwo Sided NetworkPhysical Network DensityConcession License

Segment mix

BRP Inc. segments

Full profile >

Powersports - Year-Round Products

Oligopoly

55%

Powersports - Seasonal Products

Oligopoly

30.3%

Powersports - Parts, Accessories & Apparel; OEM Engines & Gearboxes

Competitive

14.7%

Marine Boats Businesses (Divestiture/Discontinued)

Competitive

n/a

LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE segments

Full profile >

Fashion and Leather Goods

Oligopoly

48.5%

Wines and Spirits

Oligopoly

6.9%

Perfumes and Cosmetics

Oligopoly

9.9%

Watches and Jewelry

Oligopoly

12.5%

Selective Retailing

Oligopoly

21.6%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.