VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Stock Comparison

Fiserv, Inc. vs Schneider Electric SE

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Fiserv, Inc.

FISV · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$37.7B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorFinancials
Industry
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-10
Moat score
67/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Fiserv, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View FISV analysis

Schneider Electric SE

SU.PA · Euronext Paris

Market cap (USD)$132.4B
Gross margin (TTM)42.5%
Operating margin (TTM)16.9%
Net margin (TTM)10.8%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Machinery
CountryFR
Data as of2025-12-31
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Schneider Electric SE's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View SU.PA analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Schneider Electric SE leads (72 / 100 vs 67 / 100 for Fiserv, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: Fiserv, Inc. has 2 segments (50.4% in Merchant); Schneider Electric SE has 2 segments (81.6% in Energy Management).
  • Moat breadth: Fiserv, Inc. has 6 moat types across 3 domains; Schneider Electric SE has 5 across 3.

Primary market context

Fiserv, Inc.

Merchant

Market

Merchant acquiring and commerce enablement (SMB + enterprise omnichannel payments, POS, gateway/orchestration, and related software)

Geography

Global

Customer

Merchants (SMB and enterprise), plus channel partners (ISVs/ISOs/financial institutions) that serve or refer merchants

Role

Merchant acquirer / payment processor / commerce and POS platform provider

Revenue share

50.4%

Schneider Electric SE

Energy Management

Market

Energy management and electrical distribution equipment, systems and services (low/medium voltage, building and data-center electrical infrastructure, secure power, grid and energy digitalization)

Geography

Global

Customer

Buildings, data centers, industrial sites, infrastructure owners/operators; channel partners (contractors, distributors, system integrators)

Role

Manufacturer + system integrator + digital/field services provider

Revenue share

81.6%

Side-by-side metrics

Fiserv, Inc.
Schneider Electric SE
Ticker / Exchange
FISV - NASDAQ
SU.PA - Euronext Paris
Market cap (USD)
$37.7B
$132.4B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
42.5%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
16.9%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
10.8%
Sector
Financials
Industrials
Industry
n/a
Industrial - Machinery
HQ country
US
FR
Primary segment
Merchant
Energy Management
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
67 / 100
72 / 100
Moat domains
Network, Supply, Demand
Network, Supply, Demand
Last update
2026-01-10
2025-12-31

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Ecosystem ComplementsDistribution Control

Fiserv, Inc. strengths

Scale Economies Unit CostTraining Org Change CostsTwo Sided NetworkSuite Bundling

Schneider Electric SE strengths

Installed Base ConsumablesData Workflow LockinService Field Network

Segment mix

Fiserv, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Merchant

Oligopoly

50.4%

Financial

Oligopoly

49.6%

Schneider Electric SE segments

Full profile >

Energy Management

Oligopoly

81.6%

Industrial Automation

Oligopoly

18.4%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.