AUM 13F vs Glassnode comparison

AUM 13F focuses on 13F, 13D/13G, and Insider Data while Glassnode specializes in On-chain Analytics, DEX / DeFi, and Crypto Derivatives. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both AUM 13F and Glassnode offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Glassnode is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Glassnode provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. AUM 13F doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose AUM 13F if you need Analyze asset managers using public filings and drill into EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR source data., and Filter/browse by fund type (Private Equity, Hedge Fund, Real Estate) plus tags, location, and AUM size.. Go with Glassnode if Glassnode Studio: web analytics platform with a metrics library, curated dashboards, and a charting/workbench tool to visualize data and test hypotheses., and Plan-gated metric tiers + resolution: Standard (Free) includes Basic (T1) at 24h resolution; Advanced adds Essential (T2) + up to 1h resolution; Professional includes all tiers (T1–T3) + up to 10-minute resolution (where available). better fits how you invest.

Both cover ETFs. AUM 13F also includes Stocks, Hedge Funds, Private Funds, Real Estate, and Funds. Glassnode adds coverage for Cryptos, Futures, and Options.

Glassnode offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. AUM 13F uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Glassnode supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. AUM 13F has more limited export options.