FlightAware vs Open Payments (CMS) comparison

FlightAware focuses on Data APIs, APIs & SDKs, and Data Visualizations while Open Payments (CMS) specializes in Data APIs, APIs & SDKs, and Data Visualizations. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both FlightAware and Open Payments (CMS) offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

FlightAware has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Open Payments (CMS) is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose FlightAware if you need Live flight tracking and flight-status pages with dedicated views for cancellations and delays, plus the signature MiseryMap® for U.S. air traffic disruptions., and Premium subscriptions unlock unlimited flight alerts and access to three, five, or eight months of historical flight data.. Go with Open Payments (CMS) if Three core datasets each year: General Payments, Research Payments, and Ownership/Investment Interests., and Web search/explorer with filtering and charts; program year downloads available from the portal. better fits how you invest.

FlightAware offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Open Payments (CMS) uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Open Payments (CMS) supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. FlightAware has more limited export options.