VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ BEST INVESTING TOOLS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Monday, January 5, 2026

Tool Comparison

Frost & Sullivan vs Trading Economics comparison

Compare pricing, supported platforms, categories, and standout capabilities to decide which tool fits your workflow.

Frost & Sullivan logo

Frost & Sullivan

frost.com

PricingOne-time, Subscription
PlatformsWeb
Trading Economics logo

Trading Economics

tradingeconomics.com

PricingFree, Subscription
PlatformsWeb, Mobile, API
Hands-on review

Comparison highlights

  • Tool score: the chart below shows community vote sentiment over the last 8 weeks. Use it as a signal, not a verdict.
  • Overlap: both cover PMI / ISM, Retail Sales, and Housing & Construction and 3 other categories.
  • Coverage tilt: Frost & Sullivan has 2 categories you won't get in Trading Economics; Trading Economics has 10 unique categories.
  • Pricing: Frost & Sullivan is One-time, Subscription; Trading Economics is Free, Subscription.

Category leaders

  • News: Trading Economics is tagged for this workflow; Frost & Sullivan has no category votes yet.

Vote sentiment comparison

Cumulative positive vote share. Loading fresh totals...

Frost & SullivanTrading Economics

Side-by-side metrics

AttributeFrost & SullivanTrading Economics
Asset types

Supported asset classes and universes

Other

Commodities, Currencies, Bonds, Stocks, Cryptos

Experience levels

Who each product is built for

Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced

Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced

Platforms

Where you can access the product

Web

Web, Mobile, API

Pricing

High-level pricing models

One-time, Subscription

Free, Subscription

Tested

Verified by hands-on testing inside Find My Moat

Not yet

Yes

Editor pick

Featured inside curated shortlists

Standard listing

Standard listing

Coverage overlap

Shared categories

Categories where both tools offer overlapping coverage.

Frost & Sullivan strengths

Categories covered by Frost & Sullivan but not Trading Economics.

Trading Economics strengths

Categories covered by Trading Economics but not Frost & Sullivan.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which workflows do Frost & Sullivan and Trading Economics both support?

Both platforms cover PMI / ISM, Retail Sales, Housing & Construction, Consumer Sentiment, GDP, and Inflation Rates workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Which tool offers a free plan?

Trading Economics offers a free entry point, while Frost & Sullivan requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

Which tool has mobile access?

Trading Economics ships a dedicated mobile experience, while Frost & Sullivan focuses on web or desktop access.

What unique strengths set the two platforms apart?

Frost & Sullivan differentiates itself with Frost Radar™: a signature benchmarking framework that scores companies on Growth and Innovation. Reports include the PDF download plus an analyst-led Growth Dialog™ session., Online research store with single-purchase studies across industries and themes. Deliverables include Frost Radar reports, market and technology studies, and economic trackers, all offered as PDF downloads with list pricing., and iFrost Industry Research Database: a digital platform for interactive analysis with instant data updates, customizable charts, and what Frost calls “API-driven solutions.”, whereas Trading Economics stands out for REST and WebSocket API delivering data in JSON, CSV, or XML formats., Coverage spans six API domains: Indicators, Calendar, Forecasts, Markets, Earnings, and News., and Economic calendar with ~1,600 monthly events across 150+ countries, refreshed in near real time..

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.