VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

MOAT TYPE BREAKDOWN

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Moat GlossaryWide Moat Stocks Home My Collections

Legal moat

Concession License Moat

3 companies · 4 segments

A legal moat where a government or regulated authority grants an exclusive (or tightly limited) right to operate an asset, service, or market for a defined term. The concession acts like a temporary monopoly: competitors are blocked by law, and cash flows can be stable if renewal risk is managed.

Domain

Legal moat

Advantages

5 strengths

Disadvantages

5 tradeoffs

Coverage

3 companies · 4 segments

Advantages

  • Legal exclusivity: entry is blocked by statute or licensing limits, not just economics.
  • Cash flow visibility: regulated frameworks and long-term terms can stabilize demand and pricing.
  • Barrier stack: beyond exclusivity, bidders need capital, compliance, and operating track record.
  • Customer lock-in by default: users often have no alternative provider in the territory/category.
  • Optionality on renewal: incumbents can have informational and operational advantages in re-tenders.

Disadvantages

  • Term and renewal risk: economics can change sharply when the concession expires or is re-bid.
  • Political risk: tariffs, fees, taxes, or rules can be changed by governments under pressure.
  • Renegotiation risk: authorities may claw back economics if profits look “excessive.”
  • Compliance and capex obligations: service-level mandates and required investments can cap returns.
  • Concentration risk: losing one major concession can be a step-change down in earnings.

Why it exists

  • Natural monopoly economics: duplicating infrastructure is inefficient (airports, ports, utilities).
  • Public interest and safety: regulators prefer a small number of accountable operators.
  • Revenue capture: governments monetize scarce rights via concessions, tenders, or profit-share.
  • Compliance and monitoring: licensing concentrates oversight and enforcement.
  • Coordination needs: a single operator simplifies standards, pricing rules, and service levels.

Where it shows up

  • Airports and airport retail/ground handling concessions
  • Lotteries and sports betting licenses (exclusive or limited-license regimes)
  • Toll roads, bridges, tunnels, and public-private infrastructure concessions
  • Utilities and grid-related franchises (distribution territories, water concessions)
  • Ports, rail terminals, and logistics hubs operated under long-term agreements
  • Spectrum licenses and other scarce public resource allocations

Durability drivers

  • Strong relationship and credibility with the granting authority (trust, transparency, delivery)
  • Operational excellence against KPIs (service levels, uptime, customer satisfaction, safety)
  • Contract structure that protects economics (indexation, pass-throughs, clear dispute mechanisms)
  • Disciplined capex and lifecycle management (avoid deferred maintenance that hurts renewal odds)
  • Portfolio diversification across jurisdictions and contract maturities (reduce binary renewal risk)

Common red flags

  • Near-term expiries with no clear renewal path or heavy political controversy
  • Contracts allow unilateral fee cuts, renegotiation, or vague performance triggers
  • Economics depend on aggressive leverage or optimistic traffic/demand forecasts
  • Underinvestment leading to service failures, safety issues, or public backlash
  • High single-asset dependence (one license drives most profits)

How to evaluate

Key questions

  • How long is the remaining term, and what is the realistic probability of renewal?
  • What are the re-tender mechanics: open auction, incumbent preference, or negotiated renewal?
  • Are pricing and profits regulated, capped, or subject to public backlash?
  • What capex and service obligations are mandatory, and are they funded/returnable?
  • How exposed is the business to a single political jurisdiction or decision-maker?

Metrics & signals

  • Weighted average remaining life (WARL) of concessions and maturity schedule
  • Renewal win rate historically and reasons for wins/losses
  • Contract economics: revenue-share terms, indexation, pass-through clauses
  • Regulatory KPIs performance (service levels, safety, compliance incidents)
  • Required capex backlog vs cash generation and returns on invested capital
  • Jurisdiction concentration (top country/authority share of EBITDA)
  • Public and political sentiment indicators (controversies, tariff debates, investigations)

Examples & patterns

Patterns

  • Exclusive rights granted via competitive tender with strict performance obligations
  • Revenue-share or profit-share models where the authority captures upside
  • Index-linked tariffs with periodic regulatory reviews
  • Incumbents reinvest and outperform KPIs to improve renewal probability

Notes

  • This is a moat with an expiry date. The key is underwriting renewal odds and political/regulatory risk, not just current cash flows.
  • Great concessions look like annuities until re-tender risk arrives. Model the step-change scenario explicitly.

Examples in the moat database

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.