VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Wednesday, December 31, 2025
Experian plc
EXPN · London Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Experian plc is a global credit reporting and information services company with regionally managed businesses (North America, Latin America, UK and Ireland, and EMEA and Asia Pacific). Its strongest moats come from concentrated credit-bureau market structures, reinforcing data loops (furnishing and usage), and regulatory and compliance barriers; it also operates consumer marketplaces that benefit from scale and lender participation. Latin America is anchored by Serasa in Brazil (historically disclosed about 60% share), while EMEA and Asia Pacific is more fragmented and currently lower-margin, leaning more on bundling and workflow embeddedness.
Primary segment
North America
Market structure
Oligopoly
Market share
—
HHI: —
Coverage
4 segments · 6 tags
Updated 2025-12-30
Segments
North America
Consumer and business credit reporting, identity/fraud data and decision analytics, plus consumer credit/insurance marketplaces
Revenue
67.2%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
strong
Share
—
Peers
Latin America
Credit bureau data, fraud/identity and analytics solutions, plus consumer credit/debt-resolution and financial marketplaces
Revenue
14.2%
Structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Pricing
strong
Share
55%-65% (reported)
Peers
UK and Ireland
Credit reference data and analytics for underwriting and identity, plus consumer credit/eligibility services and marketplaces
Revenue
11.6%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
EMEA and Asia Pacific
Credit bureau and identity data plus decisioning and fraud prevention software across EMEA and Asia-Pacific markets
Revenue
7%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
weak
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
North America
Consumer and business credit reporting, identity/fraud data and decision analytics, plus consumer credit/insurance marketplaces
Revenue_share and operating_profit_share are calculated from FY25 revenue and Benchmark EBIT by geography in the FY25 results announcement (year ended 2025-03-31).
Data Network Effects
Network
Data Network Effects
Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
In nationwide consumer reporting, lender furnishing and bureau usage reinforce each other; scale improves file coverage and model performance.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory constraints on data use and portability
- Alternative data (cash-flow/open banking) reducing reliance on bureau files
Leading indicators
- Mortgage profiles revenue trend
- Regulatory actions or major rule changes impacting CRAs
Counterarguments
- Lenders often use multiple bureaus and proprietary data
- Point-solution vendors can win specific identity and fraud workflows
Regulated Standards Pipe
Legal
Regulated Standards Pipe
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
FCRA and FACTA compliance (accuracy, dispute handling, privacy controls) creates ongoing fixed-cost and process barriers that favor scaled incumbents.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory changes that compress pricing
- Consent orders or fines raising costs and reputational damage
Leading indicators
- CFPB/FTC enforcement intensity
- Dispute volumes and resolution times
Counterarguments
- Regulation can also constrain incumbents and reduce pricing flexibility
Two Sided Network
Network
Two Sided Network
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence
Consumer membership and lender participation increases marketplace liquidity and conversion (more members and more lenders/offers).
Erosion risks
- Marketplace disintermediation by lenders' direct channels
- Reputational damage from data breaches reducing consumer trust
Leading indicators
- Free member growth and engagement
- Lender panel size and offer mix
Counterarguments
- Consumers can compare offers via competing platforms (e.g., Credit Karma)
- Lenders may reduce marketplace spend and prioritize direct acquisition
Latin America
Credit bureau data, fraud/identity and analytics solutions, plus consumer credit/debt-resolution and financial marketplaces
Revenue_share and operating_profit_share are calculated from FY25 revenue and Benchmark EBIT by geography in the FY25 results announcement (year ended 2025-03-31).
Data Network Effects
Network
Data Network Effects
Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Serasa's scale in Brazil supports reinforcing data loops and model quality in credit decisions and fraud/identity use cases.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory or privacy changes limiting usable data
- Share gains by other Brazilian bureaus (Boa Vista, SPC, Quod)
Leading indicators
- Brazil B2B organic growth and credit volumes
- Coverage and refresh rates of bureau files
Counterarguments
- Macro cycles can reduce volumes and monetization
- Competitors can gain share if data access rules shift
Preferential Input Access
Supply
Preferential Input Access
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Broad access to banking, commercial, and judicial data sources improves completeness and timeliness, which is difficult for smaller entrants to replicate quickly.
Erosion risks
- Data furnishers renegotiating terms or restricting feeds
- Mandated data-sharing that reduces incumbents' advantage
Leading indicators
- Number and quality of major data furnishers
- Regulatory changes affecting data-sharing
Counterarguments
- Some data sources are available to multiple bureaus, reducing exclusivity over time
Two Sided Network
Network
Two Sided Network
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Consumer services platforms can create engagement loops between consumers and creditors and lenders (marketplace plus debt resolution).
Erosion risks
- Fintech and bank apps becoming the default consumer financial hub
- Lenders reducing acquisition spend or shifting channels
Leading indicators
- Latin America Consumer Services growth
- Partner and lender count and conversion rates in Limpa Nome
Counterarguments
- Marketplace economics can weaken when lenders cut marketing budgets
UK and Ireland
Credit reference data and analytics for underwriting and identity, plus consumer credit/eligibility services and marketplaces
Revenue_share and operating_profit_share are calculated from FY25 revenue and Benchmark EBIT by geography in the FY25 results announcement (year ended 2025-03-31).
Data Network Effects
Network
Data Network Effects
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Concentrated UK CRA market supports reinforcing data loops via lender furnishing and underwriting usage.
Erosion risks
- Open banking and alternative data shifting underwriting inputs
- Regulatory scrutiny of data accuracy and disputes
Leading indicators
- UK and Ireland B2B growth and new business wins
- Complaint and dispute volumes
Counterarguments
- Lenders can use multiple CRAs and proprietary data
Compliance Advantage
Legal
Compliance Advantage
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Ongoing FCA and ICO-regulated compliance processes raise fixed costs and favor scaled incumbents.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory changes increasing costs or limiting permissible data use
- High-profile compliance failures damaging trust
Leading indicators
- FCA and ICO policy changes impacting CRAs
- Dispute resolution times and complaint rates
Counterarguments
- Regulation can constrain incumbents as much as entrants
Two Sided Network
Network
Two Sided Network
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Marketplace and eligibility products benefit from more lenders and more consumer engagement; Activate is positioned as a differentiator.
Erosion risks
- Lenders shifting acquisition spend to competing platforms or direct channels
- Consumer engagement shifting to comparison sites and bank apps
Leading indicators
- Lender panel size and offer mix
- Marketplace conversion and revenue growth
Counterarguments
- Comparison sites and bank apps may outcompete on distribution
EMEA and Asia Pacific
Credit bureau and identity data plus decisioning and fraud prevention software across EMEA and Asia-Pacific markets
Revenue_share and operating_profit_share are calculated from FY25 revenue and Benchmark EBIT by geography in the FY25 results announcement (year ended 2025-03-31).
Suite Bundling
Demand
Suite Bundling
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Bundling credit and identity data with decisioning capabilities can differentiate versus point solutions in select markets (notably post-illion).
Erosion risks
- Best-of-breed point solutions winning on price and features
- Fragmentation across countries limiting scale benefits
Leading indicators
- Cross-sell penetration and client retention in Australia/NZ
- Margin improvement post-integration
Counterarguments
- Customers may unbundle if switching costs are manageable
Switching Costs General
Demand
Switching Costs General
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Decisioning and fraud tools embed into underwriting and ID workflows, creating migration friction, but competitive intensity remains high.
Erosion risks
- Price competition and commoditization in analytics and fraud tools
- Clients choosing in-house builds or alternative vendors
Leading indicators
- Net revenue retention in software contracts
- Competitive win and loss rates in fraud and decisioning
Counterarguments
- Low regional margins imply limited pricing power and weaker lock-in in many sub-markets
Evidence
There are three big nationwide providers of consumer reports: Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian.
Supports oligopoly structure in US nationwide consumer reporting.
We have extensive and expanding data assets, unparalleled breadth of capability.
Company frames data assets and breadth as a key advantage.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act ... promotes accuracy, fairness, and the privacy of personal information assembled by Credit Reporting Agencies (CRAs).
Shows statutory obligations that increase compliance costs and barriers.
We now serve over 200 million free members.
Scale supports marketplace liquidity.
Our Experian Activate capability ... creating a more seamless experience for both our financial institution clients and Experian members.
Describes a platform connecting lenders and consumers.
Showing 5 of 14 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Regulatory constraints on data use and portability
- Alternative data (cash-flow/open banking) reducing reliance on bureau files
- Regulatory changes that compress pricing
- Consent orders or fines raising costs and reputational damage
- Marketplace disintermediation by lenders' direct channels
- Reputational damage from data breaches reducing consumer trust
Leading indicators
- Mortgage profiles revenue trend
- Regulatory actions or major rule changes impacting CRAs
- CFPB/FTC enforcement intensity
- Dispute volumes and resolution times
- Free member growth and engagement
- Lender panel size and offer mix
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.