★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

The Italian Sea Group S.p.A. (TISG) Moat Analysis

The Italian Sea Group S.p.A.

TISG · Euronext Milan (Borsa Italiana)

Market cap (USD)$79.4M
SectorConsumer
IndustryLeisure
CountryIT
Data as of
Moat score
36/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

The Italian Sea Group S.p.A. builds and refits luxury yachts under Admiral, Tecnomar, Perini Navi, Picchiotti, NCA Refit, and Celi 1920. FY 2025 revenue fell 27% to EUR 295.1m; shipbuilding supplied EUR 264.9m and refit EUR 17.1m of EUR 282.0m operating revenue. EBITDA was negative EUR 99.2m, net loss was EUR 170.9m, net debt was EUR 129.6m, and every construction contract was reassessed as loss-making. Preliminary parent-company figures at 30 June 2026 showed EUR 2.6m cash, negative EUR 392.3m equity, and EUR 505.3m current liabilities. Article 44 restructuring continues; the court left construction contracts and owner termination remedies in force, the statutory auditor resigned, and a proposed EUR 140m capital authorization awaits a 30 September meeting.

Primary segment

Shipbuilding

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-08-23

Segments

Shipbuilding

Luxury yacht and superyacht shipbuilding (motor and sailing, 24m+ projects under construction/contract)

Revenue

93.9%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

SL.MIFER.MIBEN.PA

Refit

Superyacht refit, maintenance, and upgrade services (large yachts)

Revenue

6.1%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

SL.MIFER.MI

Moat Claims

Shipbuilding

Luxury yacht and superyacht shipbuilding (motor and sailing, 24m+ projects under construction/contract)

Revenue_share is FY 2025 shipbuilding revenue of EUR 264.9m divided by operating revenue of EUR 282.0m. No separate brand moat is assigned after negative margins on every construction contract and a EUR 22m Perini-brand impairment.

Oligopoly

Concession License

Legal

Strength

Strength 2 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

State concessions provide access to scarce waterfront shipyard infrastructure. Marina di Carrara runs to December 2072 and La Spezia to February 2035, but restructuring and asset-disposal risk reduce the advantage.

Concession License moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Non-renewal or adverse changes to concession terms/fees
  • Environmental/port regulation tightening for waterfront industrial sites
  • Capacity expansion by competing yards in other regions

Leading indicators

  • Concession renewals and fee changes
  • Capacity utilization and backlog coverage
  • Capex for yard upgrades/expansion

Counterarguments

  • Concessions create access but do not guarantee profitability; execution still differentiates
  • Competitors with privately owned yards can also secure capacity

Refit

Superyacht refit, maintenance, and upgrade services (large yachts)

Revenue_share is FY 2025 refit revenue of EUR 17.1m divided by operating revenue of EUR 282.0m; refit revenue fell 59% year over year.

Competitive

Concession License

Legal

Strength

Strength 2 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Refit activity benefits from scarce concession-backed waterfront access, but group distress and possible asset transfers make the advantage less durable for current shareholders.

Concession License moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Concession cost increases reduce competitiveness
  • Refit demand volatility (yacht usage/ownership cycles)
  • Capacity additions by alternative Mediterranean yards

Leading indicators

  • Refit revenue and margin trend
  • Booked refit slots and average project size
  • Regulatory changes affecting port operations

Counterarguments

  • Refit is often won project-by-project; customer loyalty can be limited
  • Owners can reposition yachts globally to other refit hubs when economics justify it

Evidence

other

state-owned maritime concessions for the Marina di Carrara and La Spezia shipyards

The current financial report confirms concession rights remain on the balance sheet; the last detailed filing disclosed the stated expiry dates.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Non-renewal or adverse changes to concession terms/fees
  • Environmental/port regulation tightening for waterfront industrial sites
  • Capacity expansion by competing yards in other regions
  • Restructuring, default or asset sales transfer the concession benefit away from current shareholders
  • Concession cost increases reduce competitiveness
  • Refit demand volatility (yacht usage/ownership cycles)

Leading indicators

  • Concession renewals and fee changes
  • Capacity utilization and backlog coverage
  • Capex for yard upgrades/expansion
  • Refit revenue and margin trend
  • Booked refit slots and average project size
  • Regulatory changes affecting port operations

Keep the research going

Created 2026-01-08
Updated 2026-08-23

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.