VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 5 CENTS

Thursday, December 25, 2025

Airbnb, Inc.

ABNB · NASDAQ

active
Market cap (USD)
SectorConsumer
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
69/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Airbnb operates a global two-sided marketplace that matches hosts and guests for short-term accommodations and experiences. Its primary moats are network effects (host supply depth and guest demand), a reputation-and-reviews trust system that supports transactions between strangers, and a globally recognized consumer brand that reduces reliance on performance marketing. Competitive intensity remains high due to OTAs, hotel/direct channels, and host/guest multi-homing, while regulation and safety incidents are persistent erosion risks.

Primary segment

Airbnb Marketplace

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

1 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2025-12-25

Segments

Airbnb Marketplace

Online marketplace for short-term accommodations and experiences

Revenue

100%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

BKNGEXPETCOMTRIP+1

Moat Claims

Airbnb Marketplace

Online marketplace for short-term accommodations and experiences

Airbnb reports one operating and one reportable segment in its FY2024 Form 10-K (Note 16: Segment and Geographic Information).

Competitive

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Two-sided marketplace dynamics: more quality supply improves guest choice and conversion; more demand increases host earnings, supporting continued supply growth. Competitive pressure and multi-homing limit how "closed" the network can be.

Erosion risks

  • Host and guest multi-homing across platforms
  • Large OTAs expanding alternative accommodations supply
  • Search/traffic disintermediation (platform policy or algorithm shifts)

Leading indicators

  • Active listings and availability growth
  • Nights and Experiences Booked growth vs peers
  • Repeat booking rate and direct traffic share

Counterarguments

  • Many listings are cross-listed; network benefits may not be exclusive
  • OTAs can bundle travel supply (hotels, flights, cars) to win demand and redirect it to their alternative-accommodation inventory

Reputation Reviews

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Reputation and review systems reduce adverse selection and support trust in staying with strangers; review history and platform enforcement increase friction to switching for high-quality hosts with accumulated reputation.

Erosion risks

  • Trust and safety incidents (fraud, assaults, discrimination) damaging perceived safety
  • Review manipulation or declining review reliability
  • Regulatory scrutiny tied to safety, discrimination, or consumer protection

Leading indicators

  • Safety incident rate and severity
  • Customer support contact rate per booking
  • Refund/chargeback rate

Counterarguments

  • Reputation can be portable in practice (social proof, social media, direct booking repeat guests)
  • Competitors can replicate review systems and safety tooling with sufficient investment

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

A globally recognized consumer brand drives demand and reduces paid acquisition reliance, supporting efficient growth. Brand is vulnerable to safety incidents and regulatory headlines.

Erosion risks

  • Negative media cycles from safety/security incidents
  • Regulatory actions leading to perception of illegality or community harm
  • Competitive brand-building by OTAs and super-app ecosystems

Leading indicators

  • Direct traffic share vs paid traffic share
  • Brand search trends and share-of-voice
  • Net Promoter Score / customer satisfaction proxies

Counterarguments

  • Travel demand is highly price-sensitive; brand may not overcome price gaps
  • Competitors can bundle travel and loyalty programs to offset Airbnb's brand advantage

Float Prepayment

Financial

Strength: 2/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Airbnb collects fees at booking and recognizes revenue at check-in; this timing can create a recurring float-like benefit (partly expressed via interest income), though it is rate-cycle dependent and constrained by customer funds payable.

Erosion risks

  • Lower interest rates reduce float value
  • Policy changes that accelerate payouts or refunds
  • Higher cancellations or chargebacks increasing reversals

Leading indicators

  • Interest income trend
  • Customer funds held and payable balances
  • Cancellation rate and chargebacks

Counterarguments

  • Float benefit is cyclical (rate dependent) and not a durable competitive moat on its own
  • Peers with similar booking flows can achieve comparable float economics

Evidence

sec_filing
Airbnb Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Our Technology

powers our two-sided marketplace

Airbnb explicitly describes its platform as a two-sided marketplace connecting hosts and guests (core network-effect framing).

sec_filing
Airbnb Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Our System of Trust

host and guest reviews

Airbnb's trust architecture is explicitly built around reviews and related protections, supporting a reputation-based marketplace.

sec_filing
Airbnb Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Our Marketing

strength of the Airbnb brand

Airbnb attributes reduced reliance on performance marketing to brand strength, implying durable top-of-funnel advantage.

sec_filing
Airbnb Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Risk Factors (Brand and Reputation)

brand and reputation are critical

The company explicitly frames brand/reputation as critical to attracting and retaining both sides of the marketplace.

sec_filing
Airbnb Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Free Cash Flow discussion

at the time of booking

The company notes it collects service fees at booking timing, generally before the stay occurs, consistent with a prepayment/float dynamic.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Host and guest multi-homing across platforms
  • Large OTAs expanding alternative accommodations supply
  • Search/traffic disintermediation (platform policy or algorithm shifts)
  • Regulatory constraints reducing supply density in key cities
  • Trust and safety incidents (fraud, assaults, discrimination) damaging perceived safety
  • Review manipulation or declining review reliability

Leading indicators

  • Active listings and availability growth
  • Nights and Experiences Booked growth vs peers
  • Repeat booking rate and direct traffic share
  • Host acquisition and retention metrics
  • Safety incident rate and severity
  • Customer support contact rate per booking
Created 2025-12-25
Updated 2025-12-25

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.