VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Monday, December 29, 2025

MercadoLibre, Inc.

MELI · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)
SectorTechnology
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
73/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

MercadoLibre runs a large marketplace and a fintech platform (Mercado Pago) across Latin America, with logistics (Mercado Envios) and advertising that reinforce engagement. In Commerce, the moat is primarily a two-sided network effect, amplified by complementary services that reduce transaction friction (payments and shipping) and improve conversion. In Fintech, embedded distribution plus transaction data enables workflow lock-in for merchants and supports credit underwriting and collection, while compliance capabilities matter as the business becomes more regulated. Key pressures are intense competition (Amazon/Shopee, banks/fintechs), multi-homing behavior, credit losses, and regulation that can change payment economics or limit bundling.

Primary segment

Commerce (Marketplace, logistics, ads, classifieds)

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 8 tags

Updated 2025-12-29

Segments

Commerce (Marketplace, logistics, ads, classifieds)

Latin American e-commerce marketplace and commerce services (online marketplace, 1P retail, fulfillment/logistics, advertising)

Revenue

58.5%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AMZNSEBABA

Fintech (Mercado Pago & credit)

Digital payments and fintech services in Latin America (wallet, merchant acquiring/QR/POS, online payments, deposits, consumer & merchant credit)

Revenue

41.5%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

NUSTNEPAGSPYPL+1

Moat Claims

Commerce (Marketplace, logistics, ads, classifieds)

Latin American e-commerce marketplace and commerce services (online marketplace, 1P retail, fulfillment/logistics, advertising)

Revenue share computed from FY2024 Form 10-K (filed 2025-02-21): Commerce $12,159M of total net revenues and financial income $20,777M.

Oligopoly

Two Sided Network

Network

Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Marketplace liquidity (buyers and sellers) reinforces itself; MercadoLibre describes its e-commerce platform as the regional leader by GMV.

Erosion risks

  • Aggressive competition from global and regional marketplaces (e.g., Amazon, Shopee) and omnichannel retailers
  • Multi-homing by sellers reduces exclusivity
  • Trust & safety failures (fraud/counterfeits) harming buyer trust

Leading indicators

  • GMV growth and GMV per buyer
  • Annual unique buyers and repeat purchase frequency
  • Active seller count and listing density

Counterarguments

  • Sellers can list across platforms; switching costs are often low
  • Consumers can price-compare easily, limiting loyalty in commoditized categories

Ecosystem Complements

Network

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Complementary services (Mercado Pago, Envios, Ads, loyalty) increase convenience and conversion, driving cross-usage across the ecosystem.

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory actions that restrict bundling/tying or constrain payments/logistics integration
  • Competitors building similar end-to-end stacks (logistics + payments + ads)
  • Interoperable standards reducing complement differentiation

Leading indicators

  • Share of users who use both Marketplace and Mercado Pago regularly (ecosystem users)
  • Mercado Envios adoption rate and delivery speed
  • Advertising revenue growth and take-rate trend

Counterarguments

  • Merchants can assemble best-of-breed tools outside MercadoLibre (independent PSPs, 3PLs, ad networks)
  • Ecosystem benefits may not outweigh fee differences for large merchants

Distribution Control

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Mercado Envios reduces friction and improves delivery speed/cost while giving MercadoLibre more end-to-end control over fulfillment and customer experience.

Erosion risks

  • Rising last-mile and carrier costs compressing unit economics
  • Execution risk in scaling physical logistics (capex, ops complexity, service disruptions)
  • Regulatory/licensing requirements for logistics operations

Leading indicators

  • On-time delivery and same/next-day delivery share
  • Cost per shipment and shipping take-rate
  • Fulfillment network expansion and utilization

Counterarguments

  • Large competitors can replicate logistics networks with sufficient capital or partnerships
  • Logistics can become a cost center if density and route economics do not improve

Fintech (Mercado Pago & credit)

Digital payments and fintech services in Latin America (wallet, merchant acquiring/QR/POS, online payments, deposits, consumer & merchant credit)

Revenue share computed from FY2024 Form 10-K (filed 2025-02-21): Fintech $8,618M of total net revenues and financial income $20,777M.

Competitive

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

MercadoLibre explicitly frames credit as an overlay that increases engagement and user lock-in on Mercado Pago.

Erosion risks

  • Instant-payment rails and open-banking portability reduce wallet stickiness
  • Consumers and merchants multi-home across banks and wallets
  • Competitive offers (yield, cashback, fee cuts) driving churn

Leading indicators

  • Fintech MAUs and transactions per active user
  • Digital account balances and retention
  • Cross-usage with Marketplace (ecosystem users)

Counterarguments

  • Payments are often low switching-cost; users can keep multiple wallets
  • Banks can subsidize products to win share

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Merchant payment flows through Mercado Pago support underwriting and automated repayment collection from marketplace sales, tightening the finance workflow.

Erosion risks

  • Merchants routing payments off-platform weakens data and collection advantage
  • Regulation constraining transaction data use for underwriting/collection
  • Higher credit losses reducing willingness to extend embedded credit

Leading indicators

  • TPV growth and merchant acquiring take rate
  • Credit penetration and repeat borrowing rates
  • NPL/delinquency and net charge-off trends

Counterarguments

  • Other PSPs and lenders can also use transaction data (including from instant payment rails)
  • Large merchants can integrate multiple PSPs, reducing dependence on Mercado Pago

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence

Operating regulated payment institutions with AML/KYC and reporting requirements can be a partial barrier that favors scaled operators with mature controls.

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory changes increasing required reserves/capital and compressing returns
  • Enforcement actions, fines, or license limitations
  • Banks and well-capitalized fintechs can also meet licensing/compliance requirements

Leading indicators

  • New central bank/fintech regulations and licensing regimes
  • Compliance incidents and regulatory findings
  • Reserve/capital requirement changes

Counterarguments

  • Banks already have large compliance infrastructure; regulation may not advantage a fintech
  • Compliance costs can grow faster than revenues, reducing competitiveness

Evidence

sec_filing
MercadoLibre, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2024) - Item 1. Business

e-commerce platform is the leader

Management characterizes the marketplace as leading in the region (by GMV), consistent with strong two-sided network effects.

sec_filing
MercadoLibre, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2024) - Strategy

fully integrated ecosystem

The company explicitly describes building an integrated ecosystem that bundles logistics, payments/fintech and advertising with the marketplace.

sec_filing
MercadoLibre, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2024) - Mercado Envios

greater control over

The filing describes Mercado Envios as enabling greater control over the user experience and faster deliveries vs third-party carriers.

sec_filing
MercadoLibre, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2024) - Lending solution

lock-in rate

The filing states credit offerings strengthen engagement and the lock-in rate of users, indicating switching-cost/habit dynamics.

sec_filing
MercadoLibre, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended Dec 31, 2024) - Merchant credit mechanics

collect principal and interest

The filing explains Mercado Pago can collect loan payments from merchants' existing Marketplace sales flows, creating workflow lock-in.

Showing 5 of 6 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Aggressive competition from global and regional marketplaces (e.g., Amazon, Shopee) and omnichannel retailers
  • Multi-homing by sellers reduces exclusivity
  • Trust & safety failures (fraud/counterfeits) harming buyer trust
  • Regulatory actions that restrict bundling/tying or constrain payments/logistics integration
  • Competitors building similar end-to-end stacks (logistics + payments + ads)
  • Interoperable standards reducing complement differentiation

Leading indicators

  • GMV growth and GMV per buyer
  • Annual unique buyers and repeat purchase frequency
  • Active seller count and listing density
  • Take rate and advertising penetration
  • Share of users who use both Marketplace and Mercado Pago regularly (ecosystem users)
  • Mercado Envios adoption rate and delivery speed
Created 2025-12-29
Updated 2025-12-29

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.