VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

ORLY · Nasdaq Global Select Market

Market cap (USD)$78.9B
SectorConsumer
IndustryAuto - Parts
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

O'Reilly Automotive is a specialty retailer and distributor of automotive aftermarket parts serving both DIY consumers and professional service providers via a dual-market strategy. The core moat is operational: a scaled, tiered distribution and store network supporting high parts availability and rapid replenishment. On the professional side, dedicated sales coverage, delivery capability, and proprietary ordering/catalogn tools deepen relationships with repair shops. Key pressures include intense price competition, online and marketplace alternatives, and the risk that peers replicate service levels and supply chain advantages.

Primary segment

DIY Aftermarket Retail

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 8 tags

Updated 2025-12-31

Segments

DIY Aftermarket Retail

Specialty automotive aftermarket parts retail (DIY channel)

Revenue

52%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AAPAMZNAZOGPC+1

Professional (B2B) Aftermarket Distribution

Automotive aftermarket parts distribution to professional service providers (repair shops, fleets, body shops)

Revenue

48%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AAPAMZNAZOGPC+1

Moat Claims

DIY Aftermarket Retail

Specialty automotive aftermarket parts retail (DIY channel)

Revenue share reflects the company's FY2024 sales mix disclosure for DIY customers.

Oligopoly

Supply Chain Control

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Tiered distribution (DCs + Hub stores) plus inventory and routing systems improve in-stock rates and speed for hard-to-find parts, supporting repeat purchases and reducing stockouts versus smaller competitors.

Erosion risks

  • Competitor distribution networks narrowing the service gap
  • E-commerce and rapid last-mile delivery reducing advantage of local stocking
  • Supply chain disruptions increasing out-of-stocks

Leading indicators

  • In-stock and fill-rate metrics (if disclosed)
  • Comparable store sales vs peers
  • Gross margin trend vs peers

Counterarguments

  • Large peers (e.g., AutoZone, NAPA/GPC) also operate scaled distribution networks, limiting uniqueness
  • Some DIY demand can be satisfied by fast-shipping online competitors for non-urgent parts

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

A large store footprint and clustered site strategy support convenience and local availability, which matters for urgent repairs and immediate DIY needs.

Erosion risks

  • Foot traffic migration to online ordering and delivery
  • Rising labor/rent costs pressuring store economics
  • Shrink and inventory carrying costs

Leading indicators

  • Net store openings and closures
  • Comparable store traffic trends
  • E-commerce share and buy-online-pickup-in-store adoption

Counterarguments

  • Omnichannel offerings and rapid delivery reduce the need for extremely dense physical footprints
  • Mass merchants and online marketplaces can undercut on price for common parts and accessories

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Service reputation is reinforced by technically trained staff and in-store service programs (testing, diagnostic support, tool loaners), which can increase conversion and repeat DIY business.

Erosion risks

  • Inability to hire/retain skilled staff reduces service differentiation
  • Brand damage from quality issues, warranty disputes, or poor service experiences
  • Increasing consumer price sensitivity

Leading indicators

  • Store labor turnover and wage pressure
  • Customer satisfaction / reviews (external tracking)
  • Warranty and return rates (if disclosed)

Counterarguments

  • For many DIY purchases, customers are primarily price-driven and can switch retailers easily
  • Online forums, videos, and diagnostics reduce the value of in-store expertise for some buyers

Habit Default

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

A loyalty program can increase repeat purchases, but switching costs for DIY customers remain low.

Erosion risks

  • Competitors matching/boosting loyalty incentives
  • Promotional intensity training customers to price-shop
  • Consumer migration to marketplace ecosystems

Leading indicators

  • Promotional and discount intensity
  • Repeat-customer frequency (if disclosed)
  • Comparable store sales stability through cycles

Counterarguments

  • Loyalty programs are easy to replicate and often do not create durable switching costs
  • Customers may multi-home across retailers depending on price/availability

Scope Economies

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Shared store, distribution, and inventory infrastructure supports serving both DIY and professional customers in the same footprint, improving asset utilization and enabling viable operations in a wider range of market densities.

Erosion risks

  • Channel-specific competitors specializing and outperforming on either DIY or pro
  • Higher complexity and cost-to-serve from supporting two customer types
  • Regime shift toward online ordering reducing store-based synergies

Leading indicators

  • DIY vs pro sales mix trend
  • Store labor productivity (sales per employee)
  • Distribution/network capex relative to sales growth

Counterarguments

  • A single footprint serving both channels may be suboptimal if each channel requires different merchandising and service models
  • Peers also pursue dual-channel strategies, reducing differentiation

Professional (B2B) Aftermarket Distribution

Automotive aftermarket parts distribution to professional service providers (repair shops, fleets, body shops)

Revenue share reflects the company's FY2024 sales mix disclosure for professional service provider customers.

Competitive

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

A dedicated professional sales force, territory coverage, and delivery/service specialists increase account penetration and responsiveness for repair shops, supporting repeat B2B ordering.

Erosion risks

  • Repair shops shifting orders to fully digital platforms
  • Repair shop consolidation increasing buyer power
  • Competitors matching delivery cadence and account service levels

Leading indicators

  • Professional customer sales growth vs DIY
  • Sales staff productivity (sales per rep, if disclosed)
  • Delivery speed/frequency and fulfillment performance

Counterarguments

  • Professional customers often multi-source based on price and immediate availability
  • Many competitors (including independents) can provide high-touch local service

Supply Chain Control

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Fast replenishment and broad SKU access (DC + Hub tiering, multiple deliveries) supports 'parts availability' as a win factor for professional accounts where downtime is costly.

Erosion risks

  • Competitor network expansion and fulfillment improvements
  • Transportation and labor cost inflation reducing service advantage
  • Macro-driven inventory reductions harming fill rates

Leading indicators

  • Fill rates and backorder levels (if disclosed)
  • Professional gross margin and delivery cost trends
  • Inventory turns and working capital intensity

Counterarguments

  • The big national competitors also have sophisticated distribution networks and can match availability in major markets
  • Some professional customers prioritize price over near-perfect availability

Procurement Inertia

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Pro ordering tools (proprietary e-commerce and mobile ordering), integrated catalog systems, and embedded programs (training, shop tools/programs) can create workflow stickiness and reduce the odds of switching primary suppliers.

Erosion risks

  • Third-party shop management systems enabling easy multi-sourcing
  • Online marketplaces and B2B aggregators improving catalog accuracy and delivery speed
  • Open standards/APIs reducing dependence on any single distributor's tools

Leading indicators

  • Adoption of digital ordering for professional accounts (if disclosed)
  • Professional customer retention and frequency metrics (if disclosed)
  • Growth in third-party parts procurement platforms

Counterarguments

  • Most repair shops can switch suppliers with minimal friction and often keep multiple vendor accounts
  • Catalog and ordering tools are increasingly commoditized and available from many distributors

Evidence

sec_filing
O'Reilly Automotive Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Strategic Regional Tiered Distribution Network

31 DCs ... 396 Hub stores.

The company describes a large, tiered distribution footprint designed to provide same-day/overnight access to a broad SKU base and enable inventory optimization.

sec_filing
O'Reilly Automotive Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Store Network / Store Locations

The company discloses thousands of stores across the U.S. (and additional stores in Mexico and Canada) and describes clustering to drive distribution and advertising efficiencies.

sec_filing
O'Reilly Automotive Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Superior Customer Service / Training

The company emphasizes technically proficient store personnel with ongoing training and highlights multiple in-store service offerings supporting DIY repair completion.

sec_filing
O'Reilly Automotive Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Marketing / O'Rewards

The company describes its O'Rewards loyalty program as encouraging repeat customers via points redeemable for rewards.

sec_filing
O'Reilly Automotive Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Dual Market Strategy (sales mix)

52% ... DIY ... 48% ... professional.

The filing describes the dual-market strategy and discloses the approximate DIY vs professional sales mix, supporting the scope/asset-sharing thesis.

Showing 5 of 8 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Competitor distribution networks narrowing the service gap
  • E-commerce and rapid last-mile delivery reducing advantage of local stocking
  • Supply chain disruptions increasing out-of-stocks
  • Foot traffic migration to online ordering and delivery
  • Rising labor/rent costs pressuring store economics
  • Shrink and inventory carrying costs

Leading indicators

  • In-stock and fill-rate metrics (if disclosed)
  • Comparable store sales vs peers
  • Gross margin trend vs peers
  • DC/Hub expansion cadence and capex intensity
  • Net store openings and closures
  • Comparable store traffic trends
Created 2025-12-31
Updated 2025-12-31

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.