VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Thursday, January 1, 2026
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
HLT · New York Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Hilton operates primarily as an asset-light hotel manager/franchisor and brand/IP licensor (Management and Franchise) plus a smaller owned/leased hotel portfolio (Ownership). The core moat is its scaled brand + loyalty + distribution platform (Hilton Honors, booking channels, reservation system), which increases affiliation value for owners and supports repeat demand. Long-term management and franchise contracts create recurring fee streams, and scale spreads platform/marketing/technology costs across ~1.27M rooms. The ownership segment benefits from the same commercial engine but is more exposed to local supply/demand cycles. Market cap: $66.77B as of 2025-12-31 (StockAnalysis: https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/hlt/market-cap/).
Primary segment
Management and Franchise
Market structure
Oligopoly
Market share
13%-15% (implied)
HHI: 1,350
Coverage
2 segments · 5 tags
Updated 2026-01-01
Segments
Management and Franchise
Hotel management, franchising and brand licensing
Revenue
72.7%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
13%-15% (implied)
Peers
Ownership
Hotel ownership and operations (owned/leased hotels)
Revenue
27.3%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
weak
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
Management and Franchise
Hotel management, franchising and brand licensing
Revenue_share based on FY2024 segment revenues (Management and franchise $3,339m; Ownership $1,255m; Total segment revenues $4,594m) from the FY2024 Form 10-K. operating_profit_share is proxied from segment Adjusted EBITDA (Management and franchise $3,339m; Ownership $172m; Total $3,511m). Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1585689/000158568925000008/hlt-20241231.htm
Two Sided Network
Network
Two Sided Network
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Hilton Honors (+211M members) and a large system footprint reinforce each other: more members drive demand for system hotels; more hotels improve earning/redemption utility and owner affiliation value.
Erosion risks
- Loyalty program multi-homing and status matches reduce exclusivity
- OTAs and alternative accommodations reduce direct brand relationship
- Program benefit changes or taxation could reduce member engagement
Leading indicators
- Hilton Honors membership growth
- Direct booking mix vs OTAs
- Hilton Honors member-night share
Counterarguments
- Travelers often belong to multiple hotel loyalty programs, weakening lock-in
- Major competitors (e.g., Marriott, IHG) run similarly scaled loyalty programs
Long Term Contracts
Demand
Long Term Contracts
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Recurring fee streams are anchored by long-term management and franchise contracts, creating relationship stickiness and reducing near-term churn in the hotel base.
Erosion risks
- Contract expirations enable reflagging to competitor brands
- Owner consolidation increases bargaining power on fee terms
- Performance clauses/brand standards disputes can increase terminations
Leading indicators
- Net unit growth and removals
- Renewal rates and contract extensions
- Owner concentration among top owners
Counterarguments
- Hotel owners can rebrand at contract end, and switching is common in down cycles
- Competitive bidding for franchise deals can compress fees and incentives
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Supply
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Scale in reservations, marketing, and tech platforms (reservations and property management systems) spreads fixed costs across ~1.27M rooms and improves owner ROI, raising the bar for smaller chains.
Erosion risks
- Reservation/tech platforms commoditize via third-party vendors
- Cybersecurity or system outages damage trust and owner value
- OTAs strengthen bargaining power and weaken direct channels
Leading indicators
- System uptime / major incident frequency
- App adoption and digital key usage
- Direct booking share and cost of distribution
Counterarguments
- Smaller chains can outsource reservations/IT to vendors, reducing scale advantage
- OTAs can route demand independent of brand reservation systems
Brand Trust
Demand
Brand Trust
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
A broad, differentiated brand portfolio supports consumer trust and owner affiliation value; strong sub-brands can attract developers/franchisees across segments (luxury to focused-service).
Erosion risks
- Service quality inconsistency across franchised properties harms reputation
- Brand proliferation/dilution reduces differentiation
- Reputation shocks from safety or service incidents
Leading indicators
- Guest satisfaction and online review scores
- Brand fee rate trends and incentive requirements
- Conversion success rate vs peers
Counterarguments
- In many stays, price and location dominate brand preference
- Competitors have similarly broad brand portfolios and loyalty ecosystems
Ownership
Hotel ownership and operations (owned/leased hotels)
Revenue_share and operating_profit_share use the same FY2024 segment tables and Adjusted EBITDA proxy as described in the Management and Franchise segment notes. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1585689/000158568925000008/hlt-20241231.htm
Ecosystem Complements
Network
Ecosystem Complements
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Owned/leased hotels benefit from Hilton's commercial engine (Hilton Honors + booking channels + mobile app features), supporting repeat business and occupancy.
Erosion risks
- Local supply growth and price competition compress ADR
- OTAs divert demand and raise distribution costs
- Macroeconomic downturns reduce travel demand
Leading indicators
- Owned/leased hotel RevPAR vs comp set
- Channel mix (direct vs OTA) at owned hotels
- Hilton Honors member share of stays at owned hotels
Counterarguments
- For owned hotels, the main competition is local and often independent; corporate ecosystem advantages may not dominate
- Alternative accommodations can pressure pricing, especially in leisure markets
Brand Trust
Demand
Brand Trust
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Owned hotels carry Hilton brands and can capture demand from brand preference and loyalty; however, property-level performance remains sensitive to local market conditions.
Erosion risks
- Brand reputation damage impacts owned properties immediately
- Renovation capex requirements can impair competitiveness
- Labor cost inflation reduces margins
Leading indicators
- Owned/leased hotel EBITDA margin trend
- Capex per key and renovation cycle timing
- Brand-level reputation metrics
Counterarguments
- Hotel rooms are largely substitutable within a local market; brand premium can be limited
- Cyclical travel demand can overwhelm brand advantages
Evidence
As of December 31, 2024, we had 211 million members in our ... Hilton Honors.
Shows scale of the loyalty network that can create reinforcing demand and owner affiliation value.
The program is an important aspect of our business and of the affiliation value for hotel owners under management and franchise contracts.
Explicitly ties loyalty program benefits to the value proposition for hotel owners (supply side).
Franchise and licensing fees represent fees earned ... usually under a long-term contract with a hotel owner.
Direct statement that franchise/licensing economics are typically governed by long-term contracts.
Management fees represent fees earned from hotels that we manage, usually under a long-term contract with a hotel owner.
Extends the same long-term contracting characteristic to managed hotels.
Hilton ... 8,447 properties comprising 1,268,206 rooms ... as of December 31, 2024.
Establishes the scale over which centralized platforms and brand programs can be leveraged.
Showing 5 of 11 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Loyalty program multi-homing and status matches reduce exclusivity
- OTAs and alternative accommodations reduce direct brand relationship
- Program benefit changes or taxation could reduce member engagement
- Contract expirations enable reflagging to competitor brands
- Owner consolidation increases bargaining power on fee terms
- Performance clauses/brand standards disputes can increase terminations
Leading indicators
- Hilton Honors membership growth
- Direct booking mix vs OTAs
- Hilton Honors member-night share
- Co-branded card spend/point sales trend
- Net unit growth and removals
- Renewal rates and contract extensions
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.