VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Friday, January 2, 2026

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

MLM · NYSE

Market cap (USD)$37.9B
SectorMaterials
IndustryConstruction Materials
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
78/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. is a U.S. natural resource-based building materials company with two Building Materials reportable segments (East Group and West Group) and a smaller Specialties segment. The core moat is local, supply-side advantage in aggregates driven by a large quarry and distribution network and control of reserves. Pricing power appears meaningful in aggregates, as reflected by sustained increases in average selling price per ton. Key risks include construction-cycle downturns, weather disruption, input cost inflation, and regulatory/permitting constraints on quarry development.

Primary segment

East Group

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-01-01

Segments

East Group

Construction aggregates and asphalt products (crushed stone, sand & gravel; asphalt) in local/regional markets

Revenue

52.4%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

Peers

VMCCRHEXPCX

West Group

Construction aggregates and downstream products/services (including asphalt/ready-mix/paving in some markets) in local/regional markets

Revenue

40.9%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

Peers

VMCCRHEXPCX

Specialties (formerly Magnesia Specialties)

Magnesia-based specialty products and related industrial materials

Revenue

6.7%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

Moat Claims

East Group

Construction aggregates and asphalt products (crushed stone, sand & gravel; asphalt) in local/regional markets

Revenue share based on nine months ended 2025-09-30 segment revenues (East $2,419m of total reportable segments $4,617m) per Form 10-Q.

Oligopoly

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Dense network of quarries/mines and distribution yards supports reliable local supply and lowers delivered cost versus more distant sources.

Erosion risks

  • Reserve depletion at key quarries
  • Operational disruptions (weather, labor, equipment)
  • Competitive quarry acquisitions in core markets

Leading indicators

  • Quarry reserve life and permitted acreage disclosures
  • Capex and acquisitions for aggregates footprint
  • Shipment volumes in East Group markets

Counterarguments

  • Large peers also operate dense quarry networks in many of the same metro corridors
  • Some demand can be served by alternative supply routes (rail/barge) if pricing spreads widen

Geographic Natural

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Control of economically viable reserves near demand centers creates a location-based supply advantage that is difficult to replicate organically.

Erosion risks

  • Permitting and land-use changes that restrict expansion
  • Increased recycled aggregates substitution in some applications
  • Demand shocks (construction downturn)

Leading indicators

  • Local permitting outcomes and community opposition in key markets
  • Recycled aggregates penetration and specs acceptance
  • Infrastructure letting volumes in core states

Counterarguments

  • In some regions, reserves are not scarce and competitors can expand supply
  • Delivered-cost advantage may narrow if logistics options improve

Benchmark Pricing Power

Financial

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Sustained price increases per ton suggest the ability to pass through inflation and capture value in tight local aggregates markets; cyclicality limits durability.

Erosion risks

  • Price resistance in a construction slowdown
  • New supply from competitors or imports in coastal markets
  • Input cost spikes (diesel) compressing delivered margins

Leading indicators

  • Aggregates average selling price per ton
  • Gross profit per ton / EBITDA per ton
  • Backlog and bid activity in infrastructure and nonresidential

Counterarguments

  • Price gains may reflect inflation pass-through and mix effects, not durable pricing power
  • During weak demand, competitors can discount to keep plants utilized

West Group

Construction aggregates and downstream products/services (including asphalt/ready-mix/paving in some markets) in local/regional markets

Revenue share based on nine months ended 2025-09-30 segment revenues (West $1,889m of total reportable segments $4,617m) per Form 10-Q.

Oligopoly

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Large multi-state quarry and distribution network supports proximity-based advantages and service levels in local markets across the West Group footprint.

Erosion risks

  • Supply disruptions (weather events, quarry issues)
  • Competitive capacity additions in fast-growth metros
  • Higher logistics costs reducing delivered competitiveness

Leading indicators

  • West Group shipment volumes and pricing trends
  • Capital additions and plant/yard expansions
  • Severe weather disruption frequency in key states

Counterarguments

  • Network-density advantages are market-by-market and may not hold uniformly across the entire footprint
  • Some competitors have comparable terminal networks in rail- and barge-served markets

Geographic Natural

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Control of reserves near fast-growing metros and infrastructure corridors supports local supply advantage where new quarry development is difficult.

Erosion risks

  • Alternative materials substitution (recycled aggregates, slag) where specs allow
  • Regional overbuilding leading to excess capacity
  • Policy changes that reduce infrastructure spending

Leading indicators

  • Infrastructure spending and letting trends in key states
  • Industrial project announcements (data centers, manufacturing)
  • Competitive capacity expansions / new quarry permits in key metros

Counterarguments

  • Where reserves are plentiful, advantage may be primarily cost execution rather than scarcity
  • Customers can dual-source across nearby suppliers if capacity is ample

Benchmark Pricing Power

Financial

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Per-ton price increases indicate pricing leverage, but durability depends on construction cycle and competitive supply in each local market.

Erosion risks

  • Downturn in Texas/West construction activity
  • Competitive discounting to fill capacity
  • Fuel and wage inflation outpacing price realization

Leading indicators

  • Aggregates ASP and gross profit per ton
  • Shipment volume growth in industrial/nonres end markets
  • Backlog trends for downstream operations (where applicable)

Counterarguments

  • Per-ton metrics can be influenced by mix and weather, not just pricing power
  • Competitors can respond with price cuts during weak demand periods

Specialties (formerly Magnesia Specialties)

Magnesia-based specialty products and related industrial materials

Revenue share based on nine months ended 2025-09-30 segment revenues (Specialties $309m of total reportable segments $4,617m) per Form 10-Q.

Oligopoly

Capex Knowhow Scale

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Multi-site manufacturing footprint suggests capital-intensive processing and operational know-how that can be difficult for new entrants to replicate quickly.

Erosion risks

  • Customer switching if products are not highly differentiated
  • Lower-cost imports or substitution by alternative materials
  • Energy and input-cost volatility affecting cost competitiveness

Leading indicators

  • Specialties segment margin and volume trends
  • Capacity utilization and energy cost exposure disclosures
  • End-market shifts (steel/environmental) affecting demand

Counterarguments

  • If products are standardized, scale/know-how may not confer strong pricing power
  • Industrial customers may have significant buyer power and multi-source strategies

Evidence

sec_filing
Martin Marietta Materials Form 10-Q (quarter ended Sep 30, 2025) - Company overview

As of September 30, 2025, the Company supplies aggregates ... through its network of approximately 390 quarries, mines and distribution yards...

Shows the breadth/density of the production and distribution footprint that underpins local market advantage.

sec_filing
Martin Marietta Materials Form 10-Q (quarter ended Sep 30, 2025) - Company overview

Martin Marietta ... is a natural resource-based building materials company.

Supports the reserve/location framing of the business (resource-based with quarry assets).

sec_filing
Martin Marietta Materials Form 10-Q (quarter ended Sep 30, 2025) - Aggregates pricing

average selling price (ASP) increased 8.0% to $23.24 per ton

Direct disclosure of year-over-year aggregates ASP increase.

news
Reuters - Martin Marietta posts higher profit on strong demand for building materials

average selling price ... rising 7% to $23.77 per ton

Independent reporting corroborating per-ton pricing momentum.

sec_filing
Martin Marietta Materials Form 10-Q (quarter ended Sep 30, 2025) - Company overview

...network of approximately 390 quarries, mines and distribution yards...

Footprint scale supports a network-density moat across the company's local markets.

Showing 5 of 9 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Reserve depletion at key quarries
  • Operational disruptions (weather, labor, equipment)
  • Competitive quarry acquisitions in core markets
  • Permitting and land-use changes that restrict expansion
  • Increased recycled aggregates substitution in some applications
  • Demand shocks (construction downturn)

Leading indicators

  • Quarry reserve life and permitted acreage disclosures
  • Capex and acquisitions for aggregates footprint
  • Shipment volumes in East Group markets
  • Local permitting outcomes and community opposition in key markets
  • Recycled aggregates penetration and specs acceptance
  • Infrastructure letting volumes in core states
Created 2026-01-01
Updated 2026-01-01

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.