VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

MMC · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorFinancials
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
65/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (Marsh McLennan) is a global professional services firm operating through Risk and Insurance Services (Marsh, Guy Carpenter) and Consulting (Mercer, Oliver Wyman Group). The brokerage segment benefits from brand trust, relationship-driven retention, and a large global service network, reinforced by regulated licensing requirements. The Consulting segment benefits from scaled expert talent and Mercer's proprietary human-capital data and tools, but faces intense competition from large consultancies, accounting firms, and in-house teams. Key erosion risks include talent retention, fee pressure, digital disintermediation, and regulatory change.

Primary segment

Risk and Insurance Services

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2025-12-31

Segments

Risk and Insurance Services

Insurance brokerage, risk advisory, and reinsurance brokerage/services

Revenue

62.8%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

AONWTWAJGBRO+1

Consulting

Human capital/benefits and retirement consulting, investment consulting/management, and management/strategy/economic consulting

Revenue

37.2%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

ACNAONWTWIBM+1

Moat Claims

Risk and Insurance Services

Insurance brokerage, risk advisory, and reinsurance brokerage/services

Revenue/operating profit shares computed from FY2024 segment revenue and operating income in the 2024 Form 10-K (filed 2025-02-10): RIS revenue $15,395m; Consulting $9,133m; total segments $24,528m; segment operating income $4,365m (RIS) and $1,770m (Consulting).

Oligopoly

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Large global broker/advisor footprint (people + local offices) supports placement execution, specialty expertise, and client service at scale.

Erosion risks

  • Talent attrition among senior producers and specialists
  • Digital/direct distribution and alternative placement channels
  • Regulatory constraints on intermediary activities in key jurisdictions

Leading indicators

  • Organic/underlying revenue growth in Marsh and Guy Carpenter
  • Client retention commentary and renewal season performance
  • Producer headcount and turnover (where disclosed)

Counterarguments

  • Global scale is shared with other large brokers (e.g., Aon/WTW), limiting uniqueness
  • Large clients can run competitive broker tenders that compress fees/commissions

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Marsh brand and reputation support winning and retaining complex risk clients and specialties where credibility matters.

Erosion risks

  • Reputational damage from compliance failures, conflicts, or service issues
  • Perceived loss of thought-leadership/innovation vs peers
  • Client dissatisfaction following large claims or placement disputes

Leading indicators

  • Large-account win/loss and renewal outcomes
  • Regulatory actions or headline litigation impacting trust
  • Client satisfaction metrics (if disclosed)

Counterarguments

  • Brand premium is weaker in commoditized lines and the mid-market where price dominates
  • Peers can match expertise in many specialties and compete aggressively on service and price

Switching Costs General

Demand

Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence

Broker relationship knowledge, program complexity, and renewal execution create switching friction; management highlights strong retention as a driver of growth.

Erosion risks

  • Increased use of standardized procurement/RFP processes for brokers
  • Transparency requirements and fee/commission pressure
  • Client insourcing of risk analytics or use of alternative platforms

Leading indicators

  • Net new business vs retention mix in organic growth commentary
  • Average commission/fee rate trends (where disclosed)
  • Competitive pressure from insurers, banks, accounting firms, and online platforms

Counterarguments

  • Many buyers periodically rebid brokerage and consulting mandates, lowering true switching costs
  • Global clients can split programs across multiple brokers (multi-homing)

Compliance Advantage

Legal

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence

Licensing and extensive regulation in insurance/reinsurance intermediation raise barriers and favor established global platforms with mature compliance capabilities.

Erosion risks

  • Regulatory reforms that reduce intermediary licensing friction
  • Rising compliance costs reducing industry economics
  • License suspensions/sanctions from compliance failures

Leading indicators

  • Regulatory change proposals (U.S., UK/EU, and major APAC markets)
  • Compliance and audit findings; enforcement actions
  • Incremental spend on compliance/cyber/data privacy programs

Counterarguments

  • Large peers also meet the regulatory bar; licensing is necessary but not sufficient
  • New entrants can partner with licensed entities or acquire licensed brokers to enter

Consulting

Human capital/benefits and retirement consulting, investment consulting/management, and management/strategy/economic consulting

Revenue/operating profit shares computed from FY2024 segment revenue and operating income in the 2024 Form 10-K (filed 2025-02-10): Consulting revenue $9,133m and operating income $1,770m.

Competitive

Service Field Network

Supply

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence

Global talent and office footprint supports delivery for large, multi-region clients (notably in Oliver Wyman Group).

Erosion risks

  • Partner/senior talent attrition and rising compensation costs
  • Client insourcing of advisory work during downturns
  • Remote delivery reducing the value of physical office networks

Leading indicators

  • Utilization and backlog trends (where disclosed)
  • Senior talent retention and hiring momentum
  • Mix shift toward higher-value specialties (AI, risk, restructuring)

Counterarguments

  • Global consulting competitors (Big Four, Accenture, etc.) have comparable or greater scale
  • Some consulting work can be commoditized or offshored, limiting network advantage

Data Workflow Lockin

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Mercer's proprietary survey data, analytics, and decision-support tools can embed in client HR decision processes, increasing switching friction and supporting differentiated advice.

Erosion risks

  • Commoditization of HR analytics and benchmarking data
  • Client adoption of enterprise HR SaaS platforms with built-in analytics
  • Data privacy regulation limiting data collection and reuse

Leading indicators

  • Adoption and growth of Mercer tools/products (where disclosed)
  • Competitive wins/losses in benefits admin and HR analytics
  • Regulatory changes affecting employee data usage

Counterarguments

  • Many providers offer similar benchmarking and analytics; differentiation may narrow
  • Clients can change advisors while keeping internal HRIS/data systems

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence

Brand and credibility help win high-stakes assignments in health/wealth/career and management/economic consulting where expertise and trust are critical.

Erosion risks

  • Brand dilution from quality issues or project failures
  • Senior departures that weaken franchise and client relationships
  • Price pressure from alternative consultancies and in-house teams

Leading indicators

  • Partner/principal turnover
  • Realized bill rates and discounting trends
  • Industry rankings, awards, and client reference momentum

Counterarguments

  • Consulting is crowded with strong brands (Big Four, strategy firms), limiting pricing leverage
  • Buyers can shift spend to technology-led delivery or internal teams

Evidence

sec_filing
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Risk and Insurance Services overview

The Risk and Insurance Services segment generated approximately 63% of the Company's total revenue in 2024 and employs approximately 52,400 colleagues worldwide.

Scale of producer/service network supports a field-network moat in brokerage/advisory delivery.

other
Marsh McLennan - 4Q & FY 2024 results (press release PDF)

The Company advises clients in 130 countries.

Global footprint supports multinational client coverage and market access.

sec_filing
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Marsh description

Marsh is the world's leading insurance broker and risk advisor, serving companies, institutions and individuals.

Direct statement supporting brand/reputation positioning in core brokerage.

sec_filing
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - MD&A Risk and Insurance Services revenue drivers

Underlying revenue growth in 2024 was driven by strong retention and new business growth at Marsh and Guy Carpenter.

Retention language supports practical switching frictions in brokerage relationships.

sec_filing
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Form 10-K (FY ended 2024-12-31) - Regulation (licensing and extensive regulation)

The Company's activities are subject to licensing requirements and extensive regulation under U.S. federal and state laws.

Supports regulation-driven barriers and the need for compliance infrastructure.

Showing 5 of 11 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Talent attrition among senior producers and specialists
  • Digital/direct distribution and alternative placement channels
  • Regulatory constraints on intermediary activities in key jurisdictions
  • Reputational damage from compliance failures, conflicts, or service issues
  • Perceived loss of thought-leadership/innovation vs peers
  • Client dissatisfaction following large claims or placement disputes

Leading indicators

  • Organic/underlying revenue growth in Marsh and Guy Carpenter
  • Client retention commentary and renewal season performance
  • Producer headcount and turnover (where disclosed)
  • Large-account win/loss and renewal outcomes
  • Regulatory actions or headline litigation impacting trust
  • Client satisfaction metrics (if disclosed)
Created 2025-12-31
Updated 2025-12-31

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.