★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

NIKE, Inc.

NKE · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$64.6B
SectorConsumer
IndustryApparel - Footwear & Accessories
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
88/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

NIKE, Inc. is a global athletic footwear and apparel company whose defensible moat is primarily consumer brand pull reinforced by product innovation and sports marketing. FY2026 revenue was $46.398B: wholesale grew 6% reported, while NIKE Direct fell 6% and Converse fell 31%. Owned channels, supplier breadth, retailer relationships, and trademark registrations support execution but are not scored as independent moats without evidence of durable incremental economics. Sell-through remains challenged, so full-price demand, product cadence, and currency-neutral growth are the central indicators of brand durability.

Primary segment

Wholesale

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-07-12

Segments

Wholesale

Branded athletic & casual footwear/apparel wholesale distribution

Revenue

59.3%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

ADS.DEPUM.DEUAADECK+6

Direct to Consumer (DTC)

Branded athletic & casual footwear/apparel direct-to-consumer retail and e-commerce

Revenue

38.1%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

LULUADS.DEPUM.DEONON+5

Converse, brand licensing & other

Converse footwear/apparel, brand licensing and miscellaneous revenue

Revenue

2.6%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

ADS.DEVFCDECK

Moat Claims

Wholesale

Branded athletic & casual footwear/apparel wholesale distribution

Revenue share uses rounded FY2026 disclosures: wholesale revenue of $27.5B divided by total NIKE, Inc. revenue of $46.398B. Wholesale grew 6% reported and 4% currency-neutral.

Competitive

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Strength 5 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 3 of 5

Global brand equity and athlete/league associations create consumer pull that supports shelf space and merchandising priority with wholesale partners.

Brand Trust moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Brand heat loss / fashion cycle
  • Reputational damage (labor, ESG, product controversy)
  • Counterfeit and brand dilution

Leading indicators

  • Full-price sell-through vs markdown rate
  • Wholesale futures orders / sell-in trend
  • Brand search and social engagement trends

Counterarguments

  • Consumers can switch brands with low friction if product cadence or storytelling weakens
  • Premium challengers (e.g., On, HOKA, Lululemon) can take share in specific categories

Direct to Consumer (DTC)

Branded athletic & casual footwear/apparel direct-to-consumer retail and e-commerce

Revenue share uses rounded FY2026 disclosures: NIKE Direct revenue of $17.7B divided by total NIKE, Inc. revenue of $46.398B. Direct fell 6% reported and 8% currency-neutral, including a 12% decline in NIKE Brand Digital.

Competitive

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Strength 5 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 1 of 5

Brand-driven demand makes Nike's owned channels a destination, supporting higher conversion and the ability to launch/allocate limited products.

Brand Trust moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Brand heat loss / fashion cycle
  • Reputational damage
  • Counterfeit and resale dynamics affecting brand perception

Leading indicators

  • Direct channel traffic and conversion
  • New product launch sell-through
  • Price realization (ASP) and discount rate

Counterarguments

  • Brand strength is not sufficient when product innovation misfires
  • Aggressive promotions can train consumers to wait for discounts

Converse, brand licensing & other

Converse footwear/apparel, brand licensing and miscellaneous revenue

Revenue share is the residual after rounded FY2026 wholesale and NIKE Direct disclosures, divided by total revenue. It includes $1.174B of Converse revenue, $49M of Global Brand Divisions revenue, and $2M of Corporate revenue; Converse fell 31% reported.

Competitive

Insufficient segment-specific evidence to assign a moat claim.

Evidence

sec_filing

NIKE is the largest seller of athletic footwear and apparel in the world.

Supports the claim that NIKE is a leading global brand in its core category.

sec_filing

Identification with prominent and influential athletes, influencers, public figures, sport teams and leagues.

Nike highlights endorsement/association as a competitive factor underpinning consumer affinity.

sec_filing

the world's leading designer, marketer and distributor of authentic athletic footwear, apparel, equipment and accessories

Current full-year release continues to describe Nike as the global category leader.

sec_filing

Marketing expenditures (including expenditures for advertising and endorsements) ...

Highlights the importance of brand marketing and endorsements in sustaining demand.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Brand heat loss / fashion cycle
  • Reputational damage (labor, ESG, product controversy)
  • Counterfeit and brand dilution
  • Athlete/league endorsement backlash
  • Reputational damage
  • Counterfeit and resale dynamics affecting brand perception

Leading indicators

  • Full-price sell-through vs markdown rate
  • Wholesale futures orders / sell-in trend
  • Brand search and social engagement trends
  • Share of voice in key sports (running, basketball, soccer)
  • Direct channel traffic and conversion
  • New product launch sell-through

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-23
Updated 2026-07-12

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.