VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
PPG Industries, Inc.
PPG · New York Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
PPG Industries is a global paints and coatings company reporting three segments: Global Architectural Coatings, Performance Coatings, and Industrial Coatings (resegmented effective December 31, 2024). Its moats are primarily demand- and execution-driven: trusted brands and broad distribution in architectural coatings, plus high-touch technical service and customer-proximate innovation in performance and industrial coatings. In OEM-facing industrial markets, on-site support and customer-specific formulations create qualification and switching friction, while scale procurement and compliance programs support resilience in a raw-materials-intensive, regulated environment. Key counter-pressures are cyclical end-market demand, buyer leverage and indexed pricing (especially in automotive OEM), and the ability of large peers to replicate service, R&D, and distribution capabilities.
Primary segment
Industrial Coatings
Market structure
Oligopoly
Market share
—
HHI: —
Coverage
3 segments · 8 tags
Updated 2026-01-12
Segments
Global Architectural Coatings
Architectural & decorative paints/coatings (EMEA, Latin America, Asia Pacific)
Revenue
24.7%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
Performance Coatings
Specialty performance coatings (aerospace, automotive refinish, protective & marine, traffic solutions)
Revenue
33.1%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
Industrial Coatings
Industrial coatings for OEM/manufacturing (automotive OEM, general industrial, packaging coatings, specialty materials)
Revenue
42.2%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
weak
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
Global Architectural Coatings
Architectural & decorative paints/coatings (EMEA, Latin America, Asia Pacific)
Revenue share computed from Note 21 (Reportable Business Segment Information): 2024 net sales to external customers $3,921M / total $15,845M. Operating profit share uses segment income $678M / total segment income $2,713M (PPG Form 10-K filed 2025-02-20).
Brand Trust
Demand
Brand Trust
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
A portfolio of established regional architectural brands plus quality/service positioning supports contractor/consumer preference and modest price realization in a competitive category.
Erosion risks
- Private label and value brands gaining share
- Retail channel consolidation pressures pricing
- Macroeconomic weakness reduces repaint/remodel demand
Leading indicators
- Net selling price realization vs volume
- Gross margin trend in the segment
- Share trends in Mexico and key European countries
Counterarguments
- Decorative paints can be price-driven and promo-heavy
- Local/regional brands often match performance at lower price points
Distribution Control
Supply
Distribution Control
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Multi-channel distribution (including company-owned stores and dealer/concessionaire networks) improves access to contractors and consumers and supports service levels versus smaller players.
Erosion risks
- Retailers/home centers shift shelf space to competing brands
- Digital/direct-to-consumer weakens traditional dealer advantages
- Rising store labor and logistics costs
Leading indicators
- Store footprint changes and same-store sales
- Dealer/concessionaire count and productivity
- Fulfillment speed and service metrics
Counterarguments
- Distribution is not exclusive; contractors can multi-source
- Large competitors have comparable or stronger channel density in certain regions
Performance Coatings
Specialty performance coatings (aerospace, automotive refinish, protective & marine, traffic solutions)
Revenue share computed from Note 21: 2024 net sales $5,237M / $15,845M. Operating profit share uses segment income $1,142M / $2,713M total segment income (PPG Form 10-K filed 2025-02-20).
Service Field Network
Supply
Service Field Network
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Dense technical/customer service and distribution coverage (including company-owned distribution for aerospace) supports specification wins, uptime, and retention in high-performance end uses.
Erosion risks
- Channel conflict and distributor consolidation
- Competitors replicate service via partnerships and acquisitions
- Standardization reduces need for high-touch support
Leading indicators
- Share gains in refinish and traffic solutions
- Aerospace backlog-to-sales conversion
- Segment margins vs peers
Counterarguments
- Large global peers can offer similar service breadth
- Customers may rebid on price when products are perceived as comparable
Learning Curve Yield
Supply
Learning Curve Yield
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Formulation know-how and customer-proximate labs enable customized products and iterative improvement for demanding applications (aerospace durability, corrosion protection, refinish color systems).
Erosion risks
- Faster innovation cycles by competitors
- Customer shift to standardized coating systems
- Sustainability regulations force rapid reformulations
Leading indicators
- R&D spend and new product launch cadence
- Warranty/field performance metrics
- Mix shift toward technology-advantaged products
Counterarguments
- R&D intensity is meaningful but not uniquely high versus large peers
- Some subcategories (protective/marine) can become price-competitive in downcycles
Industrial Coatings
Industrial coatings for OEM/manufacturing (automotive OEM, general industrial, packaging coatings, specialty materials)
Revenue share computed from Note 21: 2024 net sales $6,687M / $15,845M. Operating profit share uses segment income $893M / $2,713M total segment income (PPG Form 10-K filed 2025-02-20).
Design In Qualification
Demand
Design In Qualification
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
OEM coatings are embedded in customer production processes; on-site services and customized formulations increase switching friction once qualified on a line/program.
Erosion risks
- OEM dual-sourcing mandates reduce lock-in
- Indexed or formula-based pricing contracts compress margins
- Platform consolidation changes approved supplier lists
Leading indicators
- Automotive OEM share vs build rates
- Win/loss rates on new programs and platforms
- Contract mix: indexed vs negotiated pricing
Counterarguments
- Large OEMs have procurement leverage and can force rebids
- 2024 segment bridge cites lower selling prices (-3%), indicating limited pricing leverage in parts of the segment
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Supply
Scale Economies Unit Cost
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Scale procurement and multi-sourcing programs support security of supply and cost position in a raw-materials-intensive business.
Erosion risks
- Feedstock volatility overwhelms cost advantages
- Supplier concentration in key inputs (e.g., TiO2) limits leverage
- Tariffs and logistics shocks raise delivered cost
Leading indicators
- Raw material inflation/deflation vs price realization
- Inventory turns and service levels
- Gross margin trend through the cycle
Counterarguments
- Peers of similar scale can match procurement economics
- Customer pricing formulas can pass through input costs, limiting margin upside
Compliance Advantage
Legal
Compliance Advantage
Strength
Durability
Confidence
Evidence
Chemical registration and stewardship programs reduce regulatory friction and support continuity of supply across regulated geographies and end uses (including packaging-related applications).
Erosion risks
- Regulatory tightening forces costly reformulations
- Bans/restrictions on key chemistries reduce product viability
- Compliance costs rise faster than pricing can adjust
Leading indicators
- Regulatory changes in major jurisdictions (EU, US, China)
- R&D mix toward low-VOC/safer chemistries
- Product discontinuations due to regulation
Counterarguments
- Large incumbents generally maintain similar compliance capabilities
- Regulation can raise costs for everyone rather than creating durable differentiation
Evidence
Major Competitive Factors ... distribution and brand recognition.
PPG explicitly calls out brand recognition as a competitive factor for this segment.
Higher selling prices (+1%).
Price increases offset part of the volume decline in 2024, consistent with some brand-led pricing ability.
Company-owned stores ... paint dealers ... independent distributors ... direct to consumers.
Direct evidence of a broad distribution footprint, including owned retail in some geographies.
Major Competitive Factors ... technical and customer service ... distribution.
Technical service and distribution are explicitly cited as core competitive factors in this segment.
Direct to customers and company-owned distribution network.
Direct evidence of owned distribution infrastructure in aerospace coatings.
Showing 5 of 12 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Private label and value brands gaining share
- Retail channel consolidation pressures pricing
- Macroeconomic weakness reduces repaint/remodel demand
- Retailers/home centers shift shelf space to competing brands
- Digital/direct-to-consumer weakens traditional dealer advantages
- Rising store labor and logistics costs
Leading indicators
- Net selling price realization vs volume
- Gross margin trend in the segment
- Share trends in Mexico and key European countries
- Store footprint changes and same-store sales
- Dealer/concessionaire count and productivity
- Fulfillment speed and service metrics
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.