VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★
PRICE: 0 CENTS
Wednesday, December 31, 2025
Waste Management, Inc.
WM · New York Stock Exchange
Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.
Request update
Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.
Overview
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) is a vertically integrated North American environmental services company spanning Collection & Disposal, Recycling Processing & Sales, Renewable Energy (landfill-gas-based), and Healthcare Solutions (medical waste and secure information destruction). The core moat is local-market supply constraint driven by difficult-to-permit/expand landfill capacity and the economics of an integrated collection-transfer-disposal network. Pricing power is supported by contracted rate actions and yield management, though it remains exposed to competitive bids, regulation, and volume/mix. Recycling is structurally more competitive and commodity-linked, while renewable energy economics are influenced by RINs pricing and project execution. Key pressures include permitting/regulatory outcomes, landfill capacity depletion, recycling commodity cycles, and integration/execution in healthcare solutions.
Primary segment
Collection and Disposal
Market structure
Oligopoly
Market share
—
HHI: —
Coverage
4 segments · 6 tags
Updated 2025-12-31
Segments
Collection and Disposal
Municipal, commercial, and industrial solid waste collection, transfer, and landfill disposal
Revenue
82.2%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
strong
Share
—
Peers
Recycling Processing and Sales
Recycling collection support, materials recovery facility processing, and sale/marketing of recovered commodities
Revenue
6%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
weak
Share
—
Peers
WM Renewable Energy
Renewable natural gas (RNG), electricity, and environmental attributes derived from landfill gas
Revenue
1.7%
Structure
Competitive
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
WM Healthcare Solutions
Regulated medical waste collection and disposal plus secure information destruction services
Revenue
10%
Structure
Oligopoly
Pricing
moderate
Share
—
Peers
Moat Claims
Collection and Disposal
Municipal, commercial, and industrial solid waste collection, transfer, and landfill disposal
Revenue_share computed from WM net operating revenues for nine months ended 2025-09-30: Collection and Disposal net operating revenues = 15,524 (USD millions) out of total net operating revenues = 18,891 (USD millions). Source: WM Form 10-Q (2025-09-30) net/intercompany/gross operating revenues table.
Permits Rights Of Way
Legal
Permits Rights Of Way
Strength: 5/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Landfill siting/expansion and related permits are structurally difficult (scarce land, public opposition, and regulatory hurdles). This raises barriers to new disposal capacity and supports durable local-market advantages for incumbents with permitted assets.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory changes that accelerate approvals for new capacity
- Policy-driven diversion (organics bans, extended producer responsibility) reducing landfill volumes
- Technological substitution (waste-to-energy, advanced processing) reducing landfill dependence
Leading indicators
- Permit renewals/expansions approval rates and timelines
- Remaining permitted airspace trends and closure schedules
- Landfill pricing (tipping fee) trends versus inflation
Counterarguments
- In some regions, multiple permitted landfills exist, limiting scarcity pricing
- Municipal procurement and political pressure can restrain price increases even with capacity constraints
Capacity Moat
Supply
Capacity Moat
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: durable · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Diminishing landfill capacity and constrained ability to add new disposal alternatives increases the strategic value of existing permitted airspace and logistics networks (transfer + disposal), supporting incumbent economics over time.
Erosion risks
- Competitor expansions that add meaningful regional airspace
- Exporting waste to lower-cost regions (rail/long-haul) reducing local scarcity
- Higher diversion rates reducing demand for landfill airspace
Leading indicators
- Regional landfill utilization and capacity additions
- Transfer and long-haul economics (rail/container costs)
- Waste diversion and recycling penetration by state/metro
Counterarguments
- Capacity advantages can be offset by long-haul transfer economics and multi-region disposal options
- If volumes decline structurally, capacity becomes less valuable
Pricing power via yield management and contracted rate actions
Demand
Pricing power via yield management and contracted rate actions
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 2 evidence
Collection & Disposal pricing is supported by base-rate actions and fee mechanisms (environmental/service fees) and managed through customer mix and retention decisions, enabling sustained yield even in competitive markets.
WM discloses a specific average yield framework that includes base-rate changes and fee fluctuations (and also reflects mix/new-lost business and retention concessions), implying the business can execute price programs with measurable outcomes.
Erosion risks
- Aggressive price competition in open-bid municipal/commercial contracts
- Volume declines (macro slowdown) increasing churn and price concessions
- Regulatory/political scrutiny of landfill and hauling pricing
Leading indicators
- Reported Collection & Disposal average yield and core price metrics
- Customer churn/retention and contract win-rate trends
- Fuel/fee surcharge recovery versus cost inflation
Counterarguments
- Many customers can re-bid hauling frequently, limiting sustained pricing power
- Price increases can be offset by retention concessions and mix shifts
Recycling Processing and Sales
Recycling collection support, materials recovery facility processing, and sale/marketing of recovered commodities
Revenue_share computed from WM net operating revenues for nine months ended 2025-09-30: Recycling Processing and Sales net operating revenues = 1,137 (USD millions) out of total net operating revenues = 18,891 (USD millions). Source: WM Form 10-Q (2025-09-30) net/intercompany/gross operating revenues table.
Operational Excellence
Supply
Operational Excellence
Strength: 2/5 · Durability: fragile · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
Recycling economics are commodity- and counterparty-driven; operational performance matters (contamination, throughput, uptime), but advantages are harder to sustain versus the more permit-constrained landfill business.
Erosion risks
- Commodity price declines compressing spreads
- Counterparty concentration and contract renegotiations
- Policy shifts affecting recycling stream composition and contamination
Leading indicators
- Recovered commodity pricing indices and spreads
- Contamination rates and processing cost per ton
- MRF utilization and downtime
Counterarguments
- Processing technology is increasingly standardized and replicable
- Municipal contracts can be re-bid, limiting long-term advantage
WM Renewable Energy
Renewable natural gas (RNG), electricity, and environmental attributes derived from landfill gas
Revenue_share computed from WM net operating revenues for nine months ended 2025-09-30: WM Renewable Energy net operating revenues = 321 (USD millions) out of total net operating revenues = 18,891 (USD millions). Source: WM Form 10-Q (2025-09-30) net/intercompany/gross operating revenues table.
Preferential Input Access
Supply
Preferential Input Access
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 4/5 · 1 evidence
Ownership/control of landfill assets and landfill-gas streams provides advantaged access to feedstock for RNG/electricity projects versus developers who must contract for gas from third parties.
Erosion risks
- Regulatory changes that reduce credit values (e.g., RINs economics)
- Declines in landfill gas volume/quality over time
- New competitors securing long-term landfill gas supply contracts
Leading indicators
- RINs pricing and volatility
- Project completion cadence and uptime
- Landfill gas volume trends and capture efficiency
Counterarguments
- Energy/credit markets are competitive; feedstock advantage may not translate into durable margins
- Policy and credit-pricing risk can dominate project economics
Regulated Standards Pipe
Legal
Regulated Standards Pipe
Strength: 3/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 1 evidence
A material portion of economics is tied to regulated credit mechanisms (e.g., RINs), which can amplify returns but also introduces policy-driven fragility.
Erosion risks
- Adverse policy changes affecting RIN eligibility or values
- Counterparty/offtake renegotiations
- Project execution delays and cost overruns
Leading indicators
- RINs/credit rule changes and enforcement
- New project ROIC and payback periods
- Offtake contract terms and renewals
Counterarguments
- Regulatory benefit is broadly available to qualifying producers, limiting uniqueness
- Credit-driven economics can reverse quickly with policy shifts
WM Healthcare Solutions
Regulated medical waste collection and disposal plus secure information destruction services
Revenue_share computed from WM net operating revenues for nine months ended 2025-09-30: WM Healthcare Solutions net operating revenues = 1,893 (USD millions) out of total net operating revenues = 18,891 (USD millions). Source: WM Form 10-Q (2025-09-30) net/intercompany/gross operating revenues table.
Physical Network Density
Supply
Physical Network Density
Strength: 4/5 · Durability: medium · Confidence: 3/5 · 2 evidence
Route density and a scaled service network in medical waste collection can lower unit costs and improve service reliability. WM's entry via Stericycle adds large-scale density and national reach relative to smaller regional operators.
Erosion risks
- Integration challenges and service disruptions that hurt retention
- Aggressive pricing by regional specialists
- Regulatory/compliance failures damaging reputation and contracts
Leading indicators
- Route productivity metrics (stops per route/day) and cost per pickup
- Retention/churn of healthcare customers post-integration
- Compliance incident frequency and remediation costs
Counterarguments
- Healthcare customers may multi-source and re-bid, limiting switching costs
- Operational complexity and compliance requirements can raise costs and reduce realized scale benefits
Evidence
failure to obtain and maintain necessary permits due to land scarcity, public opposition or otherwise; diminishing landfill capacity ...
Directly states permitting difficulty and diminishing landfill capacity as material drivers/risk factors, consistent with a durable legal/physical barrier for disposal assets.
... diminishing landfill capacity, resulting in increased costs and the need for disposal alternatives ...
Explicitly links shrinking capacity to higher costs and the need for alternatives, consistent with a capacity-driven advantage for operators controlling permitted airspace.
average yield includes ... base rate changes and environmental and service fee fluctuations ...
Supports the claim that WM actively manages pricing/yield through contractual and fee-based levers.
Core price grew 6.7% during the year.
External confirmation (from WM's filed earnings materials) that pricing programs translated into material realized pricing.
changing conditions in the recycling industry, including impacts on demand, pricing and availability of counterparties ...
Company framing highlights cyclical/market-driven nature of recycling (demand/pricing/counterparty), consistent with a weaker, more fragile moat profile.
Showing 5 of 9 sources.
Risks & Indicators
Erosion risks
- Regulatory changes that accelerate approvals for new capacity
- Policy-driven diversion (organics bans, extended producer responsibility) reducing landfill volumes
- Technological substitution (waste-to-energy, advanced processing) reducing landfill dependence
- Competitor expansions that add meaningful regional airspace
- Exporting waste to lower-cost regions (rail/long-haul) reducing local scarcity
- Higher diversion rates reducing demand for landfill airspace
Leading indicators
- Permit renewals/expansions approval rates and timelines
- Remaining permitted airspace trends and closure schedules
- Landfill pricing (tipping fee) trends versus inflation
- Regional landfill utilization and capacity additions
- Transfer and long-haul economics (rail/container costs)
- Waste diversion and recycling penetration by state/metro
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.