★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Stock Profile

Waste Management, Inc. (WM) Moat Analysis

Waste Management, Inc.

WM · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$89.6B
SectorIndustrials
IndustryWaste Management
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
92/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Waste Management is an integrated environmental-services company whose Q2 2026 external revenue was $6.684B: 82.0% Collection and Disposal, 6.0% Recycling, 2.3% Renewable Energy, 9.5% Healthcare Solutions and 0.1% Corporate and Other. The core moat is two-part: difficult landfill permitting protects scarce local airspace, while collection routes and transfer stations connect customers economically to the largest disclosed U.S.-Canada landfill network. Renewable Energy separately benefits from captive landfill-gas access; it pays a visible internal royalty and remains exposed to commodity and policy pricing. Recycling and Corporate are explicitly moatless, and Healthcare lacks current evidence for a standalone barrier despite Stericycle integration. At July 24, 2026, WM had 399,715,184 common shares outstanding, excluding 230,567,277 treasury shares.

Primary segment

Collection and Disposal

Market structure

Oligopoly

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

5 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-08-23

Segments

Collection and Disposal

Municipal, commercial and industrial solid-waste collection, transfer and landfill disposal

Revenue

82%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

strong

Share

Peers

RSGWCNGFLCWST

Recycling Processing and Sales

Materials-recovery processing and sale or marketing of recovered commodities

Revenue

6%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

RSGWCNGFLCWST

WM Renewable Energy

Renewable natural gas, electricity and environmental attributes produced from landfill gas

Revenue

2.3%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

MNTKCLNEBPSHEL

WM Healthcare Solutions

Regulated medical-waste collection and disposal and secure information destruction

Revenue

9.5%

Structure

Oligopoly

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

CLHVE.PA

Corporate and Other

Ancillary activities outside WM operating businesses

Revenue

0.1%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

Moat Claims

Collection and Disposal

Municipal, commercial and industrial solid-waste collection, transfer and landfill disposal

Q2 2026 net external revenue was $5.479B of $6.684B total. Income from operations was $1.550B; its profit share is normalized across the four positive operating businesses totaling $1.635B before the $382M Corporate and Other loss. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/823768/000110465926088016/wm-20260630x10q.htm

Oligopoly

Permits Rights Of Way

Legal

Strength

Strength 5 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Existing landfill airspace is protected by site-specific environmental approvals, scarce suitable land and public opposition. These barriers limit new local disposal capacity and make permitted assets difficult to reproduce; capacity is the economic consequence of the permit barrier and is not scored separately.

Permits Rights Of Way moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Regulators approving substantial competing capacity or accelerating permit timelines
  • Waste-diversion rules reducing disposal volumes and extending regional airspace lives
  • Economical rail, long-haul or waste-to-energy alternatives weakening local scarcity

Leading indicators

  • Remaining permitted airspace and expected site closure dates
  • Permit expansion and renewal outcomes
  • Regional capacity additions and landfill utilization

Counterarguments

  • Some local markets have multiple permitted disposal options and meaningful municipal bargaining power.
  • Scarce capacity loses value if diversion or waste-export economics reduce local demand.

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

WM links dense collection routes and transfer stations to the largest disclosed landfill network in the United States and Canada. Route density lowers collection miles and transfer assets make distant owned disposal sites economical, creating a local system that a new entrant cannot reproduce asset by asset.

Physical Network Density moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitors consolidating local routes or acquiring adjacent transfer and disposal assets
  • Fuel, labor and maintenance inflation eroding route-density savings
  • Alternative disposal technologies bypassing transfer and landfill infrastructure

Leading indicators

  • Collection route productivity and fleet utilization
  • Internalization of collected waste into owned transfer and landfill assets
  • Collection-and-disposal operating margin and price-cost spread

Counterarguments

  • Republic Services and Waste Connections operate comparable integrated networks in many markets.
  • The filing does not quantify WM route-cost advantage against named competitors.

Recycling Processing and Sales

Materials-recovery processing and sale or marketing of recovered commodities

Q2 2026 net external revenue was $403M and income from operations was $36M. Profit share is normalized across positive operating businesses. Current disclosures do not establish a scarce input, cost lead or durable customer lock-in. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/823768/000110465926088016/wm-20260630x10q.htm

Competitive

WM Renewable Energy

Renewable natural gas, electricity and environmental attributes produced from landfill gas

Q2 2026 net external revenue was $157M and income from operations was $47M. Profit share is normalized across positive operating businesses. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/823768/000110465926088016/wm-20260630x10q.htm

Competitive

Preferential Input Access

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 5 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

WM controls landfill-gas feedstock through its owned or operated disposal network, avoiding the need to win third-party gas rights for each project. The internal royalty makes the economic transfer visible, while policy and energy pricing can still dominate downstream returns.

Preferential Input Access moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Lower renewable-fuel credits, RNG prices or electricity prices
  • Declining landfill-gas volume or poor capture efficiency
  • Third-party developers securing comparable landfill-gas contracts

Leading indicators

  • RNG and renewable-electricity production volume
  • RIN and energy pricing
  • New plant completion, uptime and gas-capture efficiency

Counterarguments

  • Captive feedstock is economically transferred rather than free and does not insulate commodity revenue.
  • The advantage depends on the separate landfill network and is not an independent barrier outside WM sites.

WM Healthcare Solutions

Regulated medical-waste collection and disposal and secure information destruction

Q2 2026 net external revenue was $638M and income from operations was $2M. WM disclosed integration synergies, but not route-density, retention, permit scarcity or comparative cost evidence sufficient for a moat. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/823768/000110465926088016/wm-20260630x10q.htm

Oligopoly

Insufficient segment-specific evidence to assign a moat claim.

Corporate and Other

Ancillary activities outside WM operating businesses

Q2 2026 net external revenue was $7M of $6.684B total and income from operations was a $382M loss. Including the line makes disclosed external-revenue shares reconcile exactly. Source: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/823768/000110465926088016/wm-20260630x10q.htm

Competitive

Evidence

sec_filing

failure to obtain and maintain necessary permits due to land scarcity, public opposition or otherwise

The filing identifies both the regulatory approval and the underlying physical and political constraints on landfill capacity.

sec_filing

diminishing landfill capacity, resulting in increased costs and the need for disposal alternatives

The disclosed consequence supports the value of already permitted airspace without creating a duplicate capacity claim.

sec_filing

the largest network of landfills throughout the U.S. and Canada

The filing states the scale and geographic scope of the disposal network.

sec_filing

consolidate, compact and transport waste efficiently and economically

Transfer stations connect urban collection density to more distant landfill capacity and make the network economically integrated.

sec_filing

developer, operator and owner of landfill gas-to-energy facilities in the U.S. and Canada

The energy business is built directly on landfill gas controlled through WM facilities.

Showing 5 of 6 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Regulators approving substantial competing capacity or accelerating permit timelines
  • Waste-diversion rules reducing disposal volumes and extending regional airspace lives
  • Economical rail, long-haul or waste-to-energy alternatives weakening local scarcity
  • Competitors consolidating local routes or acquiring adjacent transfer and disposal assets
  • Fuel, labor and maintenance inflation eroding route-density savings
  • Alternative disposal technologies bypassing transfer and landfill infrastructure

Leading indicators

  • Remaining permitted airspace and expected site closure dates
  • Permit expansion and renewal outcomes
  • Regional capacity additions and landfill utilization
  • Landfill yield versus inflation and disposal volume
  • Collection route productivity and fleet utilization
  • Internalization of collected waste into owned transfer and landfill assets

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-31
Updated 2026-08-23

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.