VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

PRICE: 0 CENTS

Thursday, January 8, 2026

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

ATD · Toronto Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$70.7B
SectorConsumer
IndustrySpecialty Retail
CountryCA
Data as of
Moat score
58/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Alimentation Couche-Tard is a global convenience and mobility retailer operating and licensing stores under banners such as Circle K, with a worldwide network of close to 17,000 stores as of fiscal year-end 2025. The two main revenue streams are road transportation fuel and in-store merchandise/services, with a small tail of other ancillary revenues. Its moat is mainly operational and asset-based: a dense, controlled site footprint plus a disciplined operating model that scales across geographies. Key counter-pressures are intense local price competition (especially in fuel), regulatory constraints on key categories, and long-run fuel demand headwinds from electrification.

Primary segment

Road transportation fuel (retail fuel and related mobility services)

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

3 segments · 6 tags

Updated 2026-01-05

Segments

Merchandise and services (in-store convenience retail)

Convenience retail (in-store merchandise, prepared food, beverages, tobacco, and services)

Revenue

25.2%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

3382.TCASYMUSA

Road transportation fuel (retail fuel and related mobility services)

Road transportation fuel retail (gasoline/diesel) at convenience sites; includes unmanned/automated fuel stations

Revenue

74%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

MUSAPSX3382.T

Other revenues (ancillary energy and other income streams)

Ancillary energy products and other income streams (e.g., stationary energy, aviation fuel, rentals)

Revenue

0.8%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

weak

Share

Peers

Moat Claims

Merchandise and services (in-store convenience retail)

Convenience retail (in-store merchandise, prepared food, beverages, tobacco, and services)

Revenue share computed from FY2025 MD&A table: total merchandise and service revenues $18,359.4m of total revenues $72,856.8m (52-week period ended 2025-04-27).

Competitive

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Large, dense store network (owned/controlled and licensed) supports local convenience advantage and drives purchasing and operating leverage.

Erosion risks

  • Shift of trips to delivery/quick-commerce
  • Electric vehicle adoption reducing fuel-driven traffic
  • Local competition replicating location coverage

Leading indicators

  • Net store count change and mix (company-operated vs licensed)
  • Same-store traffic / transactions
  • Merchandise and service same-store sales growth

Counterarguments

  • Convenience retail advantages are local; competitors can add nearby sites in many markets
  • For many purchases, price and proximity outweigh brand, limiting defensibility

Operational Excellence

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Standardized, disciplined operating model and best-practice sharing across geographies supports margin execution and acquisition integration.

Erosion risks

  • Cultural dilution from rapid acquisition pace
  • Labor inflation and higher turnover affecting execution
  • IT/program execution risk (pricing/loyalty/operations tools)

Leading indicators

  • Normalized SG&A growth vs sales growth
  • Merchandise and service gross margin trend
  • Post-acquisition synergy realization vs plan

Counterarguments

  • Operational practices and analytics can be copied by other scaled operators
  • Scale can create bureaucracy that offsets execution advantages

Brand Trust

Demand

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Global and local convenience banners (e.g., Circle K, Couche-Tard, Ingo, Holiday) support consumer preference and repeat visits, especially for higher-margin inside sales.

Erosion risks

  • Brand damage from service/food safety issues
  • Consumer trade-down during downturns
  • Regulatory restrictions (tobacco/nicotine, alcohol) reducing key categories

Leading indicators

  • Customer satisfaction / NPS where disclosed
  • Brand conversion progress to Circle K
  • Prepared food penetration and margin

Counterarguments

  • In many markets, consumers pick based on location and price rather than banner
  • Private label and food offers from rivals can narrow perceived differentiation

Road transportation fuel (retail fuel and related mobility services)

Road transportation fuel retail (gasoline/diesel) at convenience sites; includes unmanned/automated fuel stations

Revenue share computed from FY2025 MD&A table: total road transportation fuel revenues $53,904.7m of total revenues $72,856.8m (52-week period ended 2025-04-27).

Competitive

Supply Chain Control

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Fuel supply agreements, owned/operated terminals, and distribution capabilities can improve supply assurance and delivered cost versus smaller operators.

Erosion risks

  • Refining/logistics disruptions and regulatory changes
  • EV adoption structurally reducing fuel volumes over time
  • Competitors with equal or greater scale (integrated oil, large chains)

Leading indicators

  • Fuel gross margin per gallon/liter
  • Fuel volumes sold (same-store and total)
  • Number of fuel terminals / supply disruptions (if disclosed)

Counterarguments

  • Fuel is a commodity; cost advantages are often competed away via pump price
  • Large integrated suppliers and other scaled retailers can match logistics capabilities

Physical Network Density

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Large number of fuel-dispensing sites and automated fuel stations supports volume scale and local convenience advantage in mobility retail.

Erosion risks

  • Long-run demand decline from EV adoption
  • Price wars in local markets compressing margins
  • Environmental regulation increasing compliance capex

Leading indicators

  • Fuel volume per site
  • EV charging deployment and utilization
  • Same-store fuel volume trends

Counterarguments

  • Fuel customers are highly price-sensitive; location and brand matter less than price
  • Local competitors can often match site density in key corridors

Operational Excellence

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Operational execution (pricing, store operations, and supply chain optimization) supports maintaining fuel gross margins through volatility.

Erosion risks

  • Input cost volatility and rapid wholesale price swings
  • Regulatory price controls in some jurisdictions
  • Aggressive competitor discounting

Leading indicators

  • Fuel gross margin per gallon/liter
  • Retail-to-wholesale price lag metrics (internal)
  • Share of volume at automated fuel stations

Counterarguments

  • Fuel margins are strongly influenced by macro and competitor behavior, limiting company control
  • Optimization gains can diminish as best practices diffuse

Other revenues (ancillary energy and other income streams)

Ancillary energy products and other income streams (e.g., stationary energy, aviation fuel, rentals)

Revenue share computed from FY2025 MD&A table: total other revenues $592.7m of total revenues $72,856.8m (52-week period ended 2025-04-27).

Competitive

Scope Economies

Supply

Strength

Durability

Confidence

Evidence

Small ancillary revenue streams can leverage existing assets (sites/real estate) and customer traffic, but are generally not strongly defensible on their own.

Erosion risks

  • Commodity pricing and intense competition in ancillary energy products
  • Low scale vs specialized operators
  • Regulatory changes affecting specific products

Leading indicators

  • Other revenues growth rate
  • Contribution margin from ancillary categories

Counterarguments

  • Ancillary categories are too small to create meaningful bargaining power or defensibility
  • Specialist providers can outcompete on price and service in niche segments

Evidence

other
Management Discussion & Analysis 2025 (52-week period ended April 27, 2025) - Our Business / store network

As of April 27, 2025, our network comprised 9,217 convenience stores throughout North America, including 8,202 stores with road transportation fuel dispensing.

Supports dense footprint; the same section also describes a worldwide network close to 17,000 stores including licensed Circle K sites.

other
Management Discussion & Analysis 2025 - Summary of changes in our store network (definitions)

Sites for which the real estate is controlled by Couche-Tard (through ownership or lease agreements) ...

Highlights that a large portion of sites are controlled via owned/leased real estate, reinforcing site permanence.

other
Management Discussion & Analysis 2025 - Our Business (operating model)

We are a customer-centric, financially disciplined organization that routinely compares best practices ... to enhance our operational expertise ...

Direct statement of an operating discipline / playbook used across the network.

other
Annual Information Form (FY ended April 27, 2025) - Banner reputation

These banners have an established reputation for convenience and excellence in product selection and value ...

Explicitly frames banner reputation as a differentiator.

other
Annual Information Form (FY ended April 27, 2025) - Fuel procurement and supply agreements

We buy road transportation fuels ... mainly under supply agreements.

Supports structured procurement vs spot-only purchasing.

Showing 5 of 10 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • Shift of trips to delivery/quick-commerce
  • Electric vehicle adoption reducing fuel-driven traffic
  • Local competition replicating location coverage
  • Cultural dilution from rapid acquisition pace
  • Labor inflation and higher turnover affecting execution
  • IT/program execution risk (pricing/loyalty/operations tools)

Leading indicators

  • Net store count change and mix (company-operated vs licensed)
  • Same-store traffic / transactions
  • Merchandise and service same-store sales growth
  • Normalized SG&A growth vs sales growth
  • Merchandise and service gross margin trend
  • Post-acquisition synergy realization vs plan
Created 2026-01-05
Updated 2026-01-05

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.