VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Stock Comparison

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. vs Nabtesco Corporation

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

002352 · Shenzhen Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$27.4B
SectorIndustrials
CountryCN
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
75/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 002352 analysis

Nabtesco Corporation

6268 · Tokyo Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
SectorIndustrials
CountryJP
Data as of2025-12-30
Moat score
91/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Nabtesco Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View 6268 analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Nabtesco Corporation leads (91 / 100 vs 75 / 100 for S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.).
  • Segment focus: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 7 segments (43% in Time-definite Express); Nabtesco Corporation has 4 segments (34.2% in Component Solutions Business).
  • Moat breadth: S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. has 9 moat types across 3 domains; Nabtesco Corporation has 5 across 3.

Primary market context

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.

Time-definite Express

Market

Premium time-definite parcel express delivery services

Geography

China

Customer

B2B, B2C

Role

Integrated parcel pickup, sorting, line-haul, and last-mile delivery

Revenue share

43%

Nabtesco Corporation

Component Solutions Business

Market

Precision reduction gears (RV reducers) for industrial robot joints

Geography

Global

Customer

Industrial robot manufacturers (OEMs)

Role

Precision motion-control component supplier

Revenue share

34.2%

Side-by-side metrics

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd.
Nabtesco Corporation
Ticker / Exchange
002352 - Shenzhen Stock Exchange
6268 - Tokyo Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$27.4B
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
HQ country
CN
JP
Primary segment
Time-definite Express
Component Solutions Business
Market structure
Quasi-Monopoly
Quasi-Monopoly
Market share
64.1% (reported)
55%-65% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Strong
Strong
Moat score
75 / 100
91 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Demand, Network
Supply, Demand, Legal
Last update
2025-12-28
2025-12-30

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Brand TrustService Field Network

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. strengths

Physical Network DensityScale Economies Unit CostOperational ExcellenceTwo Sided NetworkScope EconomiesSwitching Costs GeneralNon-core ancillary activities

Nabtesco Corporation strengths

Learning Curve YieldDesign In QualificationCompliance Advantage

Segment mix

S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. segments

Full profile >

Time-definite Express

Quasi-Monopoly

43%

Economy Express

Oligopoly

10%

LTL Freight

Competitive

13%

Cold Chain & Pharmaceutical

Competitive

3%

Intra-city On-demand

Oligopoly

3%

Supply Chain & International

Competitive

25%

Other (Non-logistics & Undistributed Units)

Competitive

3%

Nabtesco Corporation segments

Full profile >

Component Solutions Business

Quasi-Monopoly

34.2%

Transport Solutions Business

Oligopoly

27.4%

Accessibility Solutions Business

Quasi-Monopoly

33%

Other Businesses

Quasi-Monopoly

5.4%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.