VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

General Dynamics Corporation vs KONE Oyj

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

General Dynamics Corporation

GD · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$92.1B
Gross margin (TTM)15.3%
Operating margin (TTM)10.3%
Net margin (TTM)8.2%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & Defense
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into General Dynamics Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View GD analysis

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryFI
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KONE Oyj's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KNEBV analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: General Dynamics Corporation leads (80 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for KONE Oyj).
  • Segment focus: General Dynamics Corporation has 4 segments (30.1% in Marine Systems (Nuclear subs + surface shipbuilding)); KONE Oyj has 3 segments (40.6% in New Building Solutions).
  • Primary market structure: Duopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Weak.
  • Moat breadth: General Dynamics Corporation has 11 moat types across 3 domains; KONE Oyj has 8 across 4.

Primary market context

General Dynamics Corporation

Marine Systems (Nuclear subs + surface shipbuilding)

Market

U.S. Navy nuclear-powered submarine construction and major surface combatant shipbuilding/lifecycle services

Geography

United States

Customer

Government (primarily U.S. Navy)

Role

Prime contractor / shipbuilder / lifecycle services

Revenue share

30.1%

KONE Oyj

New Building Solutions

Market

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Geography

Global

Customer

Property developers and general contractors

Role

OEM + project installation

Revenue share

40.6%

Side-by-side metrics

General Dynamics Corporation
KONE Oyj
Ticker / Exchange
GD - New York Stock Exchange
KNEBV - Nasdaq Helsinki
Market cap (USD)
$92.1B
$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
15.3%
n/a
Operating margin (TTM)
10.3%
n/a
Net margin (TTM)
8.2%
n/a
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
Industry
Aerospace & Defense
n/a
HQ country
US
FI
Primary segment
Marine Systems (Nuclear subs + surface shipbuilding)
New Building Solutions
Market structure
Duopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
45%-55% (estimated)
n/a
HHI estimate
5,000
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Weak
Moat score
80 / 100
63 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply, Legal
Supply, Financial, Demand, Legal
Last update
2025-12-29
2026-01-02

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Service Field NetworkCapex Knowhow ScaleCompliance Advantage

General Dynamics Corporation strengths

Brand TrustRegulated Standards PipeLong Term ContractsGovernment Contracting RelationshipsDesign In QualificationProcurement InertiaCapacity MoatSuite Bundling

KONE Oyj strengths

Negative Working CapitalInstalled Base ConsumablesSwitching Costs GeneralData Workflow LockinOperational Excellence

Segment mix

General Dynamics Corporation segments

Full profile >

Aerospace (Gulfstream + Jet Aviation)

Oligopoly

23.6%

Marine Systems (Nuclear subs + surface shipbuilding)

Duopoly

30.1%

Combat Systems (Land vehicles + munitions)

Oligopoly

18.9%

Technologies (C5ISR + Federal IT)

Competitive

27.5%

KONE Oyj segments

Full profile >

New Building Solutions

Oligopoly

40.6%

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Competitive

40.6%

Modernization

Competitive

18.8%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.