VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

KONE Oyj vs Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

KONE Oyj

KNEBV · Nasdaq Helsinki

Market cap (USD)$37B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryFI
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
63/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into KONE Oyj's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KNEBV analysis

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

KOG · Euronext Oslo Bors

Market cap (USD)$236.8B
Gross margin (TTM)38.1%
Operating margin (TTM)13.5%
Net margin (TTM)12.9%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & Defense
CountryNO
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
81/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Kongsberg Gruppen ASA's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View KOG analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Kongsberg Gruppen ASA leads (81 / 100 vs 63 / 100 for KONE Oyj).
  • Segment focus: KONE Oyj has 3 segments (40.6% in New Building Solutions); Kongsberg Gruppen ASA has 4 segments (49.5% in Kongsberg Maritime).
  • Primary market structure: Oligopoly vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: KONE Oyj has 8 moat types across 4 domains; Kongsberg Gruppen ASA has 9 across 4.

Primary market context

KONE Oyj

New Building Solutions

Market

Elevator, escalator and automatic building door new equipment (new installations)

Geography

Global

Customer

Property developers and general contractors

Role

OEM + project installation

Revenue share

40.6%

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

Kongsberg Maritime

Market

Maritime technology & integrated ship systems (propulsion, automation, bridge, energy efficiency, service)

Geography

Global

Customer

Shipyards, shipowners, offshore operators, naval customers

Role

OEM and systems integrator; aftermarket service provider

Revenue share

49.5%

Side-by-side metrics

KONE Oyj
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
Ticker / Exchange
KNEBV - Nasdaq Helsinki
KOG - Euronext Oslo Bors
Market cap (USD)
$37B
$236.8B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
38.1%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
13.5%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
12.9%
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
Industry
n/a
Aerospace & Defense
HQ country
FI
NO
Primary segment
New Building Solutions
Kongsberg Maritime
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
30%-35% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
63 / 100
81 / 100
Moat domains
Supply, Financial, Demand, Legal
Demand, Supply, Legal, Network
Last update
2026-01-02
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Capex Knowhow ScaleInstalled Base ConsumablesData Workflow LockinService Field NetworkCompliance Advantage

KONE Oyj strengths

Negative Working CapitalSwitching Costs GeneralOperational Excellence

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA strengths

Government Contracting RelationshipsDesign In QualificationLong Term ContractsEcosystem Complements

Segment mix

KONE Oyj segments

Full profile >

New Building Solutions

Oligopoly

40.6%

Service (maintenance & repairs)

Competitive

40.6%

Modernization

Competitive

18.8%

Kongsberg Gruppen ASA segments

Full profile >

Kongsberg Maritime

Oligopoly

49.5%

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace

Oligopoly

38.2%

Kongsberg Discovery

Competitive

8.8%

Kongsberg Digital

Competitive

3.5%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.