VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Friday, January 2, 2026

Stock Comparison

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. vs Melrose Industries PLC

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

LHX · NYSE

Market cap (USD)$55.9B
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorIndustrials
Industry
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-02
Moat score
72/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View LHX analysis

Melrose Industries PLC

MRO · London Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$7.7B
Gross margin (TTM)21.4%
Operating margin (TTM)7.6%
Net margin (TTM)4%
SectorIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - Machinery
CountryGB
Data as of2025-12-28
Moat score
77/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Melrose Industries PLC's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View MRO analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Melrose Industries PLC leads (77 / 100 vs 72 / 100 for L3Harris Technologies, Inc.).
  • Segment focus: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. has 4 segments (31.9% in Space & Airborne Systems); Melrose Industries PLC has 2 segments (57.9% in Structures).
  • Moat breadth: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. has 8 moat types across 3 domains; Melrose Industries PLC has 5 across 2.

Primary market context

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Space & Airborne Systems

Market

Defense & intelligence space and airborne mission systems (payloads, sensors, avionics, mission networks)

Geography

Global (U.S.-centric demand)

Customer

Government defense/intelligence agencies, prime contractors, and allied governments

Role

Prime contractor / subsystem integrator

Revenue share

31.9%

Melrose Industries PLC

Structures

Market

Aerostructures and aircraft electrical wiring systems (EWIS)

Geography

Global

Customer

Airframe OEMs; defence primes

Role

Tier-1 aerospace supplier

Revenue share

57.9%

Side-by-side metrics

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Melrose Industries PLC
Ticker / Exchange
LHX - NYSE
MRO - London Stock Exchange
Market cap (USD)
$55.9B
$7.7B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
21.4%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
7.6%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
4%
Sector
Industrials
Industrials
Industry
n/a
Industrial - Machinery
HQ country
US
GB
Primary segment
Space & Airborne Systems
Structures
Market structure
Oligopoly
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
n/a
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Moderate
Moderate
Moat score
72 / 100
77 / 100
Moat domains
Legal, Demand, Supply
Demand, Supply
Last update
2026-01-02
2025-12-28

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Design In QualificationCapex Knowhow ScaleCapacity Moat

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. strengths

Government Contracting RelationshipsCompliance AdvantageSwitching Costs GeneralProcurement InertiaKeystone Component

Melrose Industries PLC strengths

Long Term ContractsService Field Network

Segment mix

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Space & Airborne Systems

Oligopoly

31.9%

Integrated Mission Systems

Oligopoly

31.8%

Communication Systems

Oligopoly

25.4%

Aerojet Rocketdyne

Duopoly

10.9%

Melrose Industries PLC segments

Full profile >

Engines

Oligopoly

42.1%

Structures

Oligopoly

57.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.