ETF Action vs StockFetcher comparison

ETF Action focuses on ETF Overview, ETF Performance, and ETF Holdings while StockFetcher specializes in Screeners, Watchlist, and Data Visualizations. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

ETF Action offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while StockFetcher requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with ETF Action and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

ETF Action provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. StockFetcher doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose ETF Action if you need Global ETF ‘Channels’ taxonomy with category reports and dashboards (Size & Style US/Global, Region & Country, Sector & Industry, Thematic, Fixed Income, Non‑Traditional, Commodities, Crypto)., and Look‑through analytics on fund holdings for factor/style, sector/industry, country, concentration; portfolio overlap analysis across funds or entire models.. Go with StockFetcher if Filter stocks using a plain-English, text-based query language built on 125+ technical indicators., and Two plan levels: Standard and Advanced. Standard includes up to 100 saved filters and watchlists; Advanced expands to 250 each, larger symbol lists, bigger CSV exports, and advanced filter support. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. ETF Action also includes ETFs.

ETF Action offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. StockFetcher uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Both ETF Action and StockFetcher include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

ETF Action offers portfolio tracking features. StockFetcher is more focused on research and analysis.