ListingTrack vs Stockopedia comparison

ListingTrack focuses on IPO, Acquisitions, and Delisted while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 5 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

ListingTrack offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with ListingTrack and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. ListingTrack is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose ListingTrack if you need Core datasets: IPOs, SPACs, public M&A, and Pre‑IPO (free access to core data)., and Theme coverage (e.g., AI, Nuclear, Defense) and weekly newsletter with curated event‑driven summaries.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. Stockopedia adds coverage for ETFs, and Closed-End Funds.

ListingTrack offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Stockopedia uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Stockopedia supports data exports to CSV, and Excel. ListingTrack has more limited export options.

Both ListingTrack and Stockopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Stockopedia offers portfolio tracking features. ListingTrack is more focused on research and analysis.