Testfol.io vs TradeZella comparison

Both platforms cover Backtesting, and Risk Metrics workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Testfol.io offers a free entry point, while TradeZella requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

Both Testfol.io and TradeZella prioritize web or desktop access. Investors wanting a mobile-first workflow may need to rely on responsive web views.

Testfol.io differentiates itself with Portfolio Backtester for constructing multi-asset portfolios (tickers like ETFs, mutual funds, and stocks) with cashflow legs and rebalancing controls (incl. rebalance bands)., Backtest results include performance & risk statistics such as cumulative return, CAGR, MWRR, max drawdown, volatility, Sharpe/Sortino, beta, etc., and Asset Analyzer for historical performance analysis and correlations; correlations are calculated using daily returns., whereas TradeZella stands out for Trade imports via auto-sync, file upload, or manual input; supports commissions/fees, breakeven settings, and trade sharing., Broker integrations across multiple markets (stocks/options/forex/futures/crypto); examples include Interactive Brokers, Robinhood, Charles Schwab, MetaTrader 4/5, Oanda, Bybit, and Coinbase., and Customizable analytics dashboard and drill-down reporting (TradeZella lists 50+ advanced reports, plus "Risk Reports" based on R-multiple/position size)..