★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS & COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ★

Checking

Prologis, Inc.

PLD · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)$128.6B
SectorReal Estate
IndustryREIT - Industrial
CountryUS
Data as of
Moat score
86/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Request update

Spot something outdated? Send a quick note and source so we can refresh this profile.

Overview

Prologis is a global logistics real estate REIT focused on high-barrier markets and urban infill/Last Touch distribution. Scarce locations are the strongest property-level moat, supplemented by portfolio procurement scale and an A/A2 funding profile. Strategic Capital benefits from an institutional track record, but generic fund duration and access to third-party capital are not separately scored. Q1 2026 rent spreads remained positive; industrial demand, new supply, rates, and manager competition remain key risks. Prologis continued advocating for its rejected 0.084-share SEGRO proposal on July 9, but it had not announced a firm offer and must offer or withdraw by July 22, 2026 unless extended.

Primary segment

Real Estate (Rental Operations and Development)

Market structure

Competitive

Market share

HHI:

Coverage

2 segments · 7 tags

Updated 2026-07-12

Segments

Real Estate (Rental Operations and Development)

Logistics/industrial real estate leasing & development

Revenue

93.3%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

strong

Share

Peers

EGPFRSTAGTRNO+2

Strategic Capital (co-investment ventures / investment management)

Logistics real estate investment management (co-investment ventures)

Revenue

6.7%

Structure

Competitive

Pricing

moderate

Share

Peers

BXBNKKRARES+2

Moat Claims

Real Estate (Rental Operations and Development)

Logistics/industrial real estate leasing & development

Revenue share computed from FY2025 segment reporting (Note 16; dollars in thousands): Real Estate segment revenues $8.198B vs total segment revenues $8.790B. Operating_profit_share uses FY2025 segment NOI: Real Estate segment NOI $6.188B as a share of total segment NOI $6.509B. Market structure marked 'competitive' based on company disclosure that real estate ownership is highly fragmented.

Competitive

Geographic Natural

Supply

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 3 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Focus on high-barrier, high-demand logistics locations (infill/Last Touch near major cities and transportation infrastructure) that are difficult to replicate at scale.

Geographic Natural moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • New supply near key corridors reduces scarcity rents
  • Demand shock from weaker trade/e-commerce volumes
  • Tenant network redesign reduces need for infill footprint

Leading indicators

  • Vacancy and delivered supply in core infill submarkets
  • Net effective rent change and cash rent change on renewals
  • Retention rate and lease mark-to-market

Counterarguments

  • Industrial space can be built quickly where land and permits are available; advantages are market-by-market
  • Some tenants trade delivery speed for cheaper rent in ex-urban locations

Scale Economies Unit Cost

Supply

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Large owned-and-managed (O&M) footprint supports lower overhead per unit, procurement advantages, and enterprise-grade service for multi-market tenants.

Scale Economies Unit Cost moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Competitors consolidate and replicate scale benefits
  • Technology commoditizes property management processes

Leading indicators

  • Adjusted G&A as % of O&M portfolio (or per square foot)
  • Development margins and stabilized yields vs peers
  • Customer retention and multi-market leasing penetration

Counterarguments

  • Local market execution often matters more than global scale
  • Scale can increase organizational complexity and slow decisions

Cost Of Capital Advantage

Financial

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Investment-grade credit profile and liquidity can lower funding costs and increase resilience versus smaller landlords/developers, improving bid discipline and cycle survival.

Cost Of Capital Advantage moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Higher interest rates compress investment spreads
  • Credit downgrade from leverage increase or asset value decline

Leading indicators

  • Credit rating outlook changes
  • Net debt / EBITDA and fixed-charge coverage
  • Weighted average interest rate on debt and liquidity levels

Counterarguments

  • Large private capital pools can also access low-cost financing
  • In some markets, local banks may fund smaller players competitively

Long Term Contracts

Demand

Strength

Strength 3 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Industrial leases provide multi-year contracted cash flows; a 70-month weighted-average term supports visibility, while expirations allow rents to reset. The mechanism can reverse in weak leasing markets.

Long Term Contracts moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Lease rollover coincides with weaker market rents
  • Tenant incentives reduce net effective pricing
  • Tenant failures interrupt contracted cash flows

Leading indicators

  • Lease mark-to-market versus in-place rents
  • Retention and downtime on expirations
  • Same-store NOI growth

Counterarguments

  • Industrial leases are shorter and more cyclical than some property types
  • Lease repricing can work against landlords in downturns

Strategic Capital (co-investment ventures / investment management)

Logistics real estate investment management (co-investment ventures)

Revenue share computed from FY2025 segment reporting (Note 16; dollars in thousands): Strategic Capital segment revenues $592M vs total segment revenues $8.790B. Operating_profit_share uses FY2025 segment NOI: Strategic Capital segment NOI $322M as a share of total segment NOI $6.509B.

Competitive

Reputation Reviews

Demand

Strength

Strength 4 of 5

Durability

Durability 2 of 3

Confidence

Confidence 4 of 5

Evidence

Evidence 2 of 5

Fundraising and retention supported by reputation/track record with large institutional investors and a logistics-specialist platform.

Reputation Reviews moat: definition, examples, and stocks

Erosion risks

  • Underperformance vs benchmarks reduces fundraising
  • Fee compression from competition and investor bargaining power

Leading indicators

  • Assets under management (AUM) growth
  • New venture launches and capital raised
  • Fee revenue excluding promotes

Counterarguments

  • Many large global managers can offer logistics strategies and compete on fees
  • Investor loyalty may be limited if returns lag peers

Evidence

sec_filing

strategically located in markets characterized by large population densities... high barriers to entry

Supports the claim that key markets are constrained and location advantages can persist.

sec_filing

infill and Last Touch facilities... located within and adjacent to major cities to ensure same-day delivery

Urban proximity and transport adjacency create scarcity value for time-sensitive distribution.

sec_filing

1.3 billion square foot O&M portfolio... single point of contact for our multi-market customers

Scale enables centralized coverage for customers operating across many markets.

sec_filing

procurement capabilities... secure high-demand construction materials at a lower cost

Suggests unit cost advantages in development/redevelopment through purchasing power.

sec_filing

weighted average interest rate was 3.2%... total available liquidity of $7.6 billion

Balance sheet metrics support the claim of financial flexibility.

Showing 5 of 10 sources.

Risks & Indicators

Erosion risks

  • New supply near key corridors reduces scarcity rents
  • Demand shock from weaker trade/e-commerce volumes
  • Tenant network redesign reduces need for infill footprint
  • Competitors consolidate and replicate scale benefits
  • Technology commoditizes property management processes
  • Higher interest rates compress investment spreads

Leading indicators

  • Vacancy and delivered supply in core infill submarkets
  • Net effective rent change and cash rent change on renewals
  • Retention rate and lease mark-to-market
  • Adjusted G&A as % of O&M portfolio (or per square foot)
  • Development margins and stabilized yields vs peers
  • Customer retention and multi-market leasing penetration

Keep the research going

Created 2025-12-31
Updated 2026-07-12

More Rankings & Systems

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.