VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Stock Comparison

Amphenol Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Amphenol Corporation

APH · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorTechnology
Industry
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-11
Moat score
65/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Amphenol Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View APH analysis

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

CDNS · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$89.1B
Gross margin (TTM)87.8%
Operating margin (TTM)28.5%
Net margin (TTM)20.4%
SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware - Application
CountryUS
Data as of2025-12-29
Moat score
84/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CDNS analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: Cadence Design Systems, Inc. leads (84 / 100 vs 65 / 100 for Amphenol Corporation).
  • Segment focus: Amphenol Corporation has 3 segments (41.5% in Communications Solutions); Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has 3 segments (71% in Core EDA).
  • Primary market structure: Competitive vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Strong.
  • Moat breadth: Amphenol Corporation has 4 moat types across 2 domains; Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has 8 across 3.

Primary market context

Amphenol Corporation

Communications Solutions

Market

Interconnect, cable and antenna solutions for IT/datacom, mobile devices and communications infrastructure

Geography

Global

Customer

OEMs, ODM/EMS partners and network equipment/service providers

Role

Component manufacturer / interconnect and antenna solutions provider

Revenue share

41.5%

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Core EDA

Market

Electronic design automation tools for semiconductor IC design and verification (digital, custom/analog, signoff, functional verification)

Geography

Global

Customer

Semiconductor designers (fabless and IDMs) and system companies with in-house silicon teams

Role

Tool vendor / workflow platform

Revenue share

71%

Side-by-side metrics

Amphenol Corporation
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
APH - New York Stock Exchange
CDNS - NASDAQ
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$89.1B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
87.8%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
28.5%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
20.4%
Sector
Technology
Technology
Industry
n/a
Software - Application
HQ country
US
US
Primary segment
Communications Solutions
Core EDA
Market structure
Competitive
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
29%-31% (estimated)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Strong
Moat score
65 / 100
84 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Demand, Legal, Supply
Last update
2026-01-11
2025-12-29

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

Design In QualificationCapex Knowhow Scale

Amphenol Corporation strengths

Operational ExcellenceScope Economies

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. strengths

Data Workflow LockinSuite BundlingLong Term ContractsInstalled Base ConsumablesIP Choke PointService Field Network

Segment mix

Amphenol Corporation segments

Full profile >

Harsh Environment Solutions

Oligopoly

29%

Communications Solutions

Competitive

41.5%

Interconnect and Sensor Systems

Competitive

29.4%

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Core EDA

Oligopoly

71%

Semiconductor IP

Oligopoly

13%

System Design and Analysis

Competitive

16%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.