VOL. XCIV, NO. 247

★ WIDE MOAT STOCKS COMPARISON ★

NO ADVICE

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Stock Comparison

Amphenol Corporation vs CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

Compare moat strength, market structure, and segment coverage to understand how each company defends its edge.

Amphenol Corporation

APH · New York Stock Exchange

Market cap (USD)
Gross margin (TTM)
Operating margin (TTM)
Net margin (TTM)
SectorTechnology
Industry
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-11
Moat score
65/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into Amphenol Corporation's moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View APH analysis

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

CRWD · NASDAQ

Market cap (USD)$117.3B
Gross margin (TTM)74.3%
Operating margin (TTM)-7.9%
Net margin (TTM)-6.9%
SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware - Infrastructure
CountryUS
Data as of2026-01-05
Moat score
80/ 100

Weighted average of segment moat scores, combining moat strength, durability, confidence, market structure, pricing power, and market share.

Full stock profile

Dive deeper into CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.'s moat claims, evidence, and risks.

View CRWD analysis

Comparison highlights

  • Moat score gap: CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. leads (80 / 100 vs 65 / 100 for Amphenol Corporation).
  • Segment focus: Amphenol Corporation has 3 segments (41.5% in Communications Solutions); CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. has 2 segments (95.1% in Falcon Platform Subscriptions).
  • Primary market structure: Competitive vs Oligopoly. Pricing power: Weak vs Moderate.
  • Moat breadth: Amphenol Corporation has 4 moat types across 2 domains; CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. has 5 across 2.

Primary market context

Amphenol Corporation

Communications Solutions

Market

Interconnect, cable and antenna solutions for IT/datacom, mobile devices and communications infrastructure

Geography

Global

Customer

OEMs, ODM/EMS partners and network equipment/service providers

Role

Component manufacturer / interconnect and antenna solutions provider

Revenue share

41.5%

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

Falcon Platform Subscriptions

Market

Cloud-native endpoint, workload and identity protection / XDR cybersecurity platforms

Geography

Global

Customer

Enterprises, SMBs, and public sector organizations (end-users via direct sales and channel partners)

Role

SaaS cybersecurity platform vendor

Revenue share

95.1%

Side-by-side metrics

Amphenol Corporation
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
Ticker / Exchange
APH - New York Stock Exchange
CRWD - NASDAQ
Market cap (USD)
n/a
$117.3B
Gross margin (TTM)
n/a
74.3%
Operating margin (TTM)
n/a
-7.9%
Net margin (TTM)
n/a
-6.9%
Sector
Technology
Technology
Industry
n/a
Software - Infrastructure
HQ country
US
US
Primary segment
Communications Solutions
Falcon Platform Subscriptions
Market structure
Competitive
Oligopoly
Market share
n/a
17.7% (reported)
HHI estimate
n/a
n/a
Pricing power
Weak
Moderate
Moat score
65 / 100
80 / 100
Moat domains
Demand, Supply
Network, Demand
Last update
2026-01-11
2026-01-05

Moat coverage

Shared moat types

No overlap yet.

Amphenol Corporation strengths

Design In QualificationOperational ExcellenceScope EconomiesCapex Knowhow Scale

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. strengths

Data Network EffectsEcosystem ComplementsSuite BundlingSwitching Costs GeneralReputation Reviews

Segment mix

Amphenol Corporation segments

Full profile >

Harsh Environment Solutions

Oligopoly

29%

Communications Solutions

Competitive

41.5%

Interconnect and Sensor Systems

Competitive

29.4%

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. segments

Full profile >

Falcon Platform Subscriptions

Oligopoly

95.1%

Professional Services (Incident Response & Proactive Services)

Competitive

4.9%

Want the full wide moat stocks list?

Browse the full ranking of wide moat stocks, updated with moat scores and segment context.

View the moat stocks list

Looking for expansion-stage stocks?

Proven models entering the expansion stage with unit economics that work.

View expansion-stage stocks

Curation & Accuracy

This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).

Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.