Danelfin vs FinancialReports.eu comparison

Danelfin focuses on Stock Ideas, Screeners, and Portfolio while FinancialReports.eu specializes in Improved Filings, Regulatory Filings Monitoring, and IPO. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Danelfin and FinancialReports.eu offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose Danelfin if you need AI Score (1–10) estimates the probability of a stock or ETF outperforming the market over the next three months, based on daily analysis of ~10,000 features per stock across technical, fundamental, and sentiment data., and Coverage includes U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs as well as STOXX 600 European stocks, with historical daily AI Scores available since 2017.. Go with FinancialReports.eu if Real‑time filings ingestion (<5 min typical) with continuous 30‑minute source refresh; 4.5M+ filings from 16,645 companies across 44 markets., and Programmatic access to filings, company metadata, languages, countries, filing types, sources; Markdown extraction endpoint for filing text. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. FinancialReports.eu adds coverage for Mutual Funds, and Closed-End Funds.

FinancialReports.eu offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Danelfin uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Danelfin supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. FinancialReports.eu has more limited export options.

Both Danelfin and FinancialReports.eu include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Danelfin offers portfolio tracking features. FinancialReports.eu is more focused on research and analysis.