Estimize vs QuantRocket comparison

Estimize focuses on Screeners, Alerts, and Calendar while QuantRocket specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Backtesting. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Estimize and QuantRocket offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose Estimize if you need Crowdsourced EPS and revenue estimates on a non-GAAP basis, with more than 120,000 contributors and coverage of over 3,000 stocks and 80+ macro indicators each quarter., and Earnings and economic calendars (including CPI and PPI) with the ability for users to submit their own estimates.. Go with QuantRocket if Includes survivorship-bias-free US minute-bar data (from 2007 onward) for Zipline backtests and live trading, with optional real-time feeds from brokers like IBKR and Alpaca., and Supports point-in-time screening and ranking pipelines, and integrates with Alphalens and Pyfolio for in-notebook analysis inside Jupyter. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. QuantRocket adds coverage for ETFs, Futures, Currencies, and Options.

Yes, both platforms provide real-time market data. This makes either suitable for active trading strategies where timing matters.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (JSON). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

QuantRocket connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. Estimize requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

Both Estimize and QuantRocket include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.