Stockopedia vs The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) comparison

Both platforms cover Financials, Analyst Forecasts, Analyst Recommendations, Analyst Price Targets, News, Alerts, and Calendar workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) offers a free entry point, while Stockopedia requires a paid subscription. Review the pricing table to see how the paid tiers compare.

Both Stockopedia and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) support web and mobile access, making it easy to keep tabs on research away from the desk.

Stockopedia differentiates itself with Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications., and Portfolios (“Folios”) track performance with time-weighted returns and integrate company announcements and reporting calendars., whereas The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) stands out for Comprehensive business and markets reporting, plus a Market Data Center spanning indexes, stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, and mutual funds., Built-in calendars, including a downloadable U.S. economic calendar and an earnings calendar within Market Data., and Market lists and stats such as 52-week highs/lows, analyst upgrades/downgrades, and dividend pages..