Finbox vs Ziggma comparison

Finbox focuses on Stock Ideas, Screeners, and Stock Comparison while Ziggma specializes in Stock Ideas, Screeners, and ETF Screeners. They overlap in 5 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Finbox and Ziggma offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Choose Finbox if you need Stock screener with filters, columns, sorting, saved screens, and “import results to watchlist” workflow; exports are CSV and require Starter + Data Boost or Professional., and Data Explorer with 1,000+ metrics plus metric definitions and example calculations.. Go with Ziggma if Portfolio tracker that can aggregate multiple brokerage/retirement accounts into a single consolidated view, with analytics around performance, allocation, and risk., and Account linking via third-party aggregation providers; Ziggma states it does not access or store broker login credentials and uses OAuth where available. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Ziggma adds coverage for Mutual Funds.

Ziggma offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Finbox uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Finbox supports data exports to CSV, and Excel. Ziggma has more limited export options.

Both Finbox and Ziggma include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Ziggma offers portfolio tracking features. Finbox is more focused on research and analysis.