FXMacroData vs okama comparison

FXMacroData focuses on Central Bank Watcher, Interest Rates, and Inflation Rates while okama specializes in Quant, Data Visualizations, and Portfolio. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both FXMacroData and okama offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

okama is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose FXMacroData if you need REST API for macro indicators by currency (e.g., `/api/usd/inflation`) returning JSON time-series with `start`/`end` query parameters; indicator docs show an API-key parameter., and Indicator catalog includes GDP gr, inflation, trade balance, unemployment/employment metrics, policy & interbank rates, and government bond yields (by currency).. Go with okama if Interactive Efficient Frontier (mean–variance) widget for quick visualization., and Compare-assets widget covering returns, drawdowns, CVaR, and correlations. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Currencies. FXMacroData also includes Bonds. okama adds coverage for Stocks, ETFs, Commodities, and Mutual Funds.

FXMacroData offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. okama uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

okama offers portfolio tracking features. FXMacroData is more focused on research and analysis.