FXMacroData vs USAspending comparison

FXMacroData focuses on Central Bank Watcher, Interest Rates, and Inflation Rates while USAspending specializes in Data APIs, APIs & SDKs, and Data Visualizations. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both FXMacroData and USAspending offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

USAspending is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose FXMacroData if you need REST API for macro indicators by currency (e.g., `/api/usd/inflation`) returning JSON time-series with `start`/`end` query parameters; indicator docs show an API-key parameter., and Indicator catalog includes GDP gr, inflation, trade balance, unemployment/employment metrics, policy & interbank rates, and government bond yields (by currency).. Go with USAspending if Advanced Search & profiles across awards, recipients, agencies, federal accounts; filters include date, place of performance, NAICS/PSC, Assistance Listing (formerly CFDA), DEFC for COVID/infrastructure., and Spending Explorer and Agency/Federal Account profiles for top‑down views of obligations/outlays and drill‑downs by budget hierarchy. better fits how you invest.

Both cover common asset types. FXMacroData also includes Currencies, and Bonds. USAspending adds coverage for Other.

FXMacroData offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. USAspending uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

USAspending supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. FXMacroData has more limited export options.