Investing.com vs Investopedia comparison

Investing.com focuses on News, Alerts, and Calendar while Investopedia specializes in Education, Blogs, and News. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Investing.com and Investopedia offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Investing.com has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Investopedia is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose Investing.com if you need Multi-asset market data site/app with quotes, charts, news and tools; claims coverage across stocks, commodities, crypto, indices, currencies, bonds, funds, interest rates, ETFs, futures and options., and Cross-device alerts: customized price alerts on any instrument plus alerts for selected economic events; managed via an Alert Center on web and apps.. Go with Investopedia if Large education library: 36,000+ articles including 14,000+ definitions of financial terms; editorial standards emphasize education (no buy/sell/hold recommendations)., and Dedicated market news coverage (e.g., markets, companies, earnings, crypto, personal finance). better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, ETFs, Bonds, Commodities, Cryptos, and Options. Investing.com also includes Currencies, Funds, Futures, and Other.

Investing.com supports data exports to CSV, and XML. Investopedia has more limited export options.

Both Investing.com and Investopedia include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.