Open Payments (CMS) vs Visible Alpha comparison

Open Payments (CMS) focuses on Data APIs, APIs & SDKs, and Data Visualizations while Visible Alpha specializes in Financials, Analyst Forecasts, and Analyst Price Targets. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Open Payments (CMS) offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Visible Alpha requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Open Payments (CMS) and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Open Payments (CMS) is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose Open Payments (CMS) if you need Three core datasets each year: General Payments, Research Payments, and Ownership/Investment Interests., and Web search/explorer with filtering and charts; program year downloads available from the portal.. Go with Visible Alpha if Deep, line‑item consensus built from full working sell‑side models; 7,000+ companies, 250+ contributing brokers, 1M+ consensus line items; 170+ industries covered., and VA Actuals: stitched historical fundamentals not always disclosed in filings, integrated with forward estimates for seamless time series. better fits how you invest.

Both cover common asset types. Open Payments (CMS) also includes Other. Visible Alpha adds coverage for Stocks.

Visible Alpha offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Open Payments (CMS) uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.