★ BEST INVESTING TOOLS COMPARISON ★
VOL. XCIV, NO. 247
Source check: AlphaSense checked August 4, 2026
Tool Comparison
AlphaSense vs Screener.in
Pick AlphaSense if
AlphaSense
Contact for pricing · Web · Mobile · API
- You want an API so you can script or automate things
- You care about transcripts, APIs & data feeds, and sheets / excel add-ins, things Screener.in doesn't offer
Pick Screener.in if
Screener.in
Free • Paid plans available · Web · Mobile
- You'd rather start free and only pay if you outgrow it
- You care about institutional ownership, something AlphaSense doesn't offer
- You're newer to investing and want something approachable
Skip both if: Neither one clicks with how you research; there are strong third options.
See alternativesOutbound links may include affiliate or sponsor codes.
Our take
The bottom line
AlphaSense and Screener.in cover a lot of the same ground (8 shared categories, including news, alerts, and screeners), so for the basics you won't go far wrong with either. The real difference is focus: only AlphaSense gives you transcripts and APIs & data feeds, and only Screener.in gives you institutional ownership.
What readers say
AlphaSense
Vote once to reveal the community verdict.
Screener.in
Vote once to reveal the community verdict.
Key differences at a glance
- Free plan
- Screener.in
- API access
- AlphaSense
- Beginner friendly
- Screener.in
See for yourself
How they stack up
The side-by-side table: pricing, platforms, data, and coverage at a glance.ShowHide
How they stack up
The side-by-side table: pricing, platforms, data, and coverage at a glance.| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing & plans | ||
Starting price | Contact for pricing | Free • Paid plans available |
Free tier | No | Yes |
Free trial | — | — |
Plan limits | — | 9 limits: Hobby Investor (Free): stock alerts: 10, Hobby Investor (Free): screen alerts: 2 +7 more |
| Platforms & access | ||
Web app | Yes | Yes |
Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
API access | Yes | No |
Broker sync | — | No |
Integrations | Google Drive, Microsoft SharePoint +3 more | — |
| Audience & fit | ||
Experience level | Intermediate, Advanced | Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced |
Best for | Institutional Investors, Analysts +2 more | — |
Categories covered | 11 | 9 |
Regions | — | APAC |
| Data & capabilities | ||
Data quality | — | 4 signals: Latency: End of Day, Granularity: EOD +2 more |
Data partners | Tegus and Canalyst | — |
Capabilities | Universe builder and AI summaries: Filings, Transcripts, and News | Custom formulas |
Security | 5 signals: SOC2, ISO27001 +3 more | — |
| Try it | Visit AlphaSense | Visit Screener.in |
Where each one shines
What AlphaSense and Screener.in each do best.ShowHide
Where each one shines
What AlphaSense and Screener.in each do best.What AlphaSense does best
- Generative Search to ask research questions and receive cited answers tied back to source documents.
- Deep Research for iterative AI-assisted market research that can run many searches and synthesize large source sets.
- Search tools across curated external content such as broker research, independent research, expert transcripts, SEC filings, news, and regulatory content.
- Dashboards, alerts, watchlists, and the mobile app to monitor companies, topics, markets, and research themes.
- Financial Data and Company Profile workflows for screening, comparables, M&A transactions, funding rounds, valuation metrics, and Excel-connected research where available.
What Screener.in does best
- Tools for building custom Indian equity screens with query-language filters and custom ratios using a decade of financial fundamentals.
- Support for setting automatic email alerts when new quarterly results match saved screens.
- Export support for full screen results to CSV and generate company Excel files with custom templates on Premium.
- Tools for creating stock price alerts for levels, moving averages, and PE ratios, with higher limits on Premium.
- Search, filter, and set alerts for company announcements and corporate disclosures.
Every detail we compared
Every tracked attribute for AlphaSense and Screener.in, side by side.ShowHide
Every detail we compared
Every tracked attribute for AlphaSense and Screener.in, side by side.| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Coverage & fit | ||
Asset types | Stocks | Stocks |
Experience | IntermediateAdvanced | BeginnerIntermediateAdvanced |
Target audience | Institutional InvestorsAnalystsAsset ManagersHedge Funds | Not specified |
Regions | Not specified | APAC |
Coverage details | Identifiers: Ticker and CIK | Countries: INIdentifiers: Ticker |
| Data | ||
Data freshness | Not specified | End of Day |
Data granularity | Not specified | EOD |
Data partners | TegusCanalyst | Not specified |
| Access & integrations | ||
API protocols | GraphQLREST | Not specified |
API auth & delivery | Auth: APIKey and OAuth2SDKs: TS and PythonDocs | Not specified |
Integrations | Google DriveMicrosoft SharePointDropboxBoxEgnyte | Not specified |
Export formats | Not specified | CSVExcel |
| Plans & trust | ||
Security & compliance | SOC2ISO27001Encryption at restEncryption in transitRole-based access | Not specified |
Capability signals | Universe builderAI summaries: Filings, Transcripts, and News | Custom formulas |
Vendor & support | AlphaSense Inc.Founded 2011Support: Email | Mittal Analytics Private LtdCountry: IndiaFounded 2009Support: Email and Phone |
Curation ratings | Not specified | Methodology 4/5Reliability 4/5UX 5/5 |
Green tags are exclusive to that tool in this comparison.
What you'll actually pay
Plans, billing, trials, and per-month pricing for both tools.ShowHide
What you'll actually pay
Plans, billing, trials, and per-month pricing for both tools.| Tier | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | — | Free“Hobby Investor (Free)”stock alerts: 10 · screen alerts: 2 · +2 more |
| Entry paid plan | — | INR 4999/yr“Active Investor (Premium)”stock alerts: 800 · screen alerts: 75 · +3 more |
| Custom / enterprise | Contact sales“Market Intelligence” | — |
Questions we keep getting
What's the difference between AlphaSense and Screener.in?
AlphaSense leans toward news, alerts, and screeners, while Screener.in puts more weight on screeners, watchlist, and alerts. They overlap in 8 categories, so for most people it comes down to workflow preference and price.
Is AlphaSense or Screener.in free to use?
Screener.in has a free tier, so you can get started without paying anything. AlphaSense is paid-only. If budget matters, start with Screener.in and see how far it takes you before opening your wallet.
Which is better for beginners: AlphaSense or Screener.in?
Screener.in is the friendlier place to start; its interface takes less getting used to. Both work fine once you're past the basics.
Does AlphaSense or Screener.in have an API?
AlphaSense has an API for programmatic access and custom integrations. Screener.in doesn't, so you're working through its interface.
Should I choose AlphaSense or Screener.in?
It depends on what you're after. Pick AlphaSense if transcripts and APIs & data feeds matter to you; go with Screener.in if you'd rather have institutional ownership. And if you only need the basics both share, let price decide.
Can I export data from AlphaSense and Screener.in?
Screener.in exports to CSV and Excel. AlphaSense is stingier about getting data out.
Which has a better stock screener: AlphaSense or Screener.in?
Both AlphaSense and Screener.in include stock screeners, and they differ more in interface than raw power; try both and see which one clicks for you.
Keep researching
More comparisons to check
Other tools you might like
Keep Exploring
Feedback
Spot stale pricing, missing features, or a comparison that feels off? Send feedback on the verdict, table, alternatives, or recommendation.
Curation & Accuracy
This directory blends AI‑assisted discovery with human curation. Entries are reviewed, edited, and organized with the goal of expanding coverage and sharpening quality over time. Your feedback helps steer improvements (because no single human can capture everything all at once).
Details change. Pricing, features, and availability may be incomplete or out of date. Treat listings as a starting point and verify on the provider’s site before making decisions. If you spot an error or a gap, send a quick note and I’ll adjust.