AmiBroker vs StockFetcher comparison

AmiBroker focuses on Data Visualizations, Screeners, and Backtesting while StockFetcher specializes in Screeners, Watchlist, and Data Visualizations. They overlap in 3 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Both platforms require a paid subscription to access their full feature set. Compare the pricing details above to find the best value for your needs.

StockFetcher is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Choose AmiBroker if you need Portfolio-level backtesting with realistic account constraints and position sizing; customizable reports/metrics (equity/drawdown charts, custom backtest procedure)., and Optimization & validation workflows: portfolio-level optimization, walk-forward testing, and Monte Carlo simulation/robustness testing.. Go with StockFetcher if Filter stocks using a plain-English, text-based query language built on 125+ technical indicators., and Two plan levels: Standard and Advanced. Standard includes up to 100 saved filters and watchlists; Advanced expands to 250 each, larger symbol lists, bigger CSV exports, and advanced filter support. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. AmiBroker also includes Futures, Mutual Funds, and Currencies.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (CSV). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

AmiBroker connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. StockFetcher requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

AmiBroker is built with active traders in mind, offering features like real-time data and technical analysis. StockFetcher is better suited for buy-and-hold investors focused on fundamentals.

Both AmiBroker and StockFetcher include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.