AUM 13F vs ETF Action comparison

AUM 13F focuses on 13F, 13D/13G, and Insider Data while ETF Action specializes in ETF Overview, ETF Performance, and ETF Holdings. They overlap in 4 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both AUM 13F and ETF Action offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

ETF Action is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

ETF Action provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. AUM 13F doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose AUM 13F if you need Analyze asset managers using public filings and drill into EDGAR, IAPD, and CAFR source data., and Filter/browse by fund type (Private Equity, Hedge Fund, Real Estate) plus tags, location, and AUM size.. Go with ETF Action if Global ETF ‘Channels’ taxonomy with category reports and dashboards (Size & Style US/Global, Region & Country, Sector & Industry, Thematic, Fixed Income, Non‑Traditional, Commodities, Crypto)., and Look‑through analytics on fund holdings for factor/style, sector/industry, country, concentration; portfolio overlap analysis across funds or entire models. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. AUM 13F also includes Hedge Funds, Private Funds, Real Estate, and Funds.

ETF Action offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. AUM 13F uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

ETF Action supports data exports to Excel, CSV, and PDF. AUM 13F has more limited export options.

ETF Action includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. AUM 13F focuses on other analytical tools.

ETF Action offers portfolio tracking features. AUM 13F is more focused on research and analysis.