Calcbench vs Hunter comparison

Calcbench focuses on Financials, Improved Filings, and Diff View while Hunter specializes in APIs & SDKs, Webhooks, and Zapier / Make. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Calcbench and Hunter offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Hunter is more beginner-friendly with an approachable interface. Both can work for intermediate users.

Yes, both platforms offer API access for developers and quants who want to build custom integrations or automate their workflows.

Choose Calcbench if you need Web-based platform for as-reported financial statements and as-filed SEC documents (10-Ks, 10-Qs, earnings press releases)., and Interactive Disclosures & Footnotes viewer: browse filings by topic/section (e.g., MD&A, Risk Factors) with pinpoint text search; compare peers/time periods; pull tables/numbers into Excel.. Go with Hunter if Domain Search to discover professional emails by company or domain., and Email Finder tool that returns verified or deduced addresses with a confidence score and verification status. better fits how you invest.

Both cover common asset types. Calcbench also includes Stocks. Hunter adds coverage for Other.

Calcbench offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Hunter uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.