Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) vs Stockopedia comparison

Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) focuses on Valuation Models, Financials, and Interest Rates while Stockopedia specializes in Screeners, Stock Ideas, and Financials. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) offers a free tier that lets you get started without paying, while Stockopedia requires a subscription. If budget is a concern, start with Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) and upgrade later if you need more advanced features.

Stockopedia has a mobile app so you can check your research on the go. Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) is web-only, so you'll need a browser to access it from mobile devices.

Choose Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) if you need US industry table with: Industry, # of firms, Beta, Cost of Equity, E/(D+E), Std. Dev. in stock, Cost of Debt, Tax Rate, After‑tax Cost of Debt, D/(D+E), and WACC., and Direct Excel download (wacc.xls) for offline analysis.. Go with Stockopedia if Equity screener with more than 350 ratios and over 65 prebuilt “GuruScreens.”, and StockRanks™ system rates every stock on Quality, Value, and Momentum, with additional risk ratings and style classifications. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) also includes Real Estate. Stockopedia adds coverage for ETFs, and Closed-End Funds.

Both platforms let you export data to spreadsheets (Excel). This is useful for custom analysis or record-keeping.

Stockopedia includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) focuses on other analytical tools.

Stockopedia offers portfolio tracking features. Damodaran - Cost of Capital by Sector (US) is more focused on research and analysis.