Danelfin vs Ziggma comparison

Danelfin focuses on Stock Ideas, Screeners, and Portfolio while Ziggma specializes in Stock Ideas, Screeners, and ETF Screeners. They overlap in 5 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both Danelfin and Ziggma offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

Danelfin provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Ziggma doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose Danelfin if you need AI Score (1–10) estimates the probability of a stock or ETF outperforming the market over the next three months, based on daily analysis of ~10,000 features per stock across technical, fundamental, and sentiment data., and Coverage includes U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs as well as STOXX 600 European stocks, with historical daily AI Scores available since 2017.. Go with Ziggma if Portfolio tracker that can aggregate multiple brokerage/retirement accounts into a single consolidated view, with analytics around performance, allocation, and risk., and Account linking via third-party aggregation providers; Ziggma states it does not access or store broker login credentials and uses OAuth where available. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks, and ETFs. Ziggma adds coverage for Mutual Funds.

Ziggma offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Danelfin uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

Danelfin supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. Ziggma has more limited export options.

Both Danelfin and Ziggma include stock screeners. Try each to see which filtering options and interface you prefer.

Both platforms include portfolio tracking, so you can monitor your holdings, performance, and allocation in one place.