ETF Action vs Journalytic comparison

ETF Action focuses on ETF Overview, ETF Performance, and ETF Holdings while Journalytic specializes in Notes & Highlights, Checklist, and Data Visualizations. They overlap in 1 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both ETF Action and Journalytic offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

ETF Action provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. Journalytic doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose ETF Action if you need Global ETF ‘Channels’ taxonomy with category reports and dashboards (Size & Style US/Global, Region & Country, Sector & Industry, Thematic, Fixed Income, Non‑Traditional, Commodities, Crypto)., and Look‑through analytics on fund holdings for factor/style, sector/industry, country, concentration; portfolio overlap analysis across funds or entire models.. Go with Journalytic if Pricing: Journalytic is in an open beta period and is currently completely free (a future freemium model is mentioned)., and Investment journaling tool designed to record thoughts, track decisions, and surface feedback/blindspots in the investing process. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Stocks. ETF Action also includes ETFs. Journalytic adds coverage for Cryptos, Real Estate, and Private Funds.

ETF Action offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. Journalytic uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

ETF Action supports data exports to Excel, CSV, and PDF. Journalytic has more limited export options.

ETF Action includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. Journalytic focuses on other analytical tools.

ETF Action offers portfolio tracking features. Journalytic is more focused on research and analysis.