Fiscal.ai vs The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) comparison

Both platforms cover Financials, Dividends, Analyst Forecasts, Analyst Recommendations, Analyst Price Targets, News, Alerts, and Calendar workflows, so you can research those use cases in either tool before digging into the feature differences below.

Both Fiscal.ai and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) keep freemium access with optional paid upgrades, so you can trial each platform before committing.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) ships a dedicated mobile experience, while Fiscal.ai focuses on web or desktop access.

Fiscal.ai differentiates itself with Modern web-based research terminal with dashboards, customizable watchlists, portfolio stats, and fundamental charting for 100,000+ global stocks, ETFs, and funds., Deep fundamental coverage: 10–20+ years of annual and 6–40+ quarters of quarterly financials by plan, with ratios, common-size statements, and adjusted metrics., and Rich segment & KPI database across ~2,300 large-cap names, including company-specific business KPIs that are hard to aggregate manually., whereas The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) stands out for Comprehensive business and markets reporting, plus a Market Data Center spanning indexes, stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, and mutual funds., Built-in calendars, including a downloadable U.S. economic calendar and an earnings calendar within Market Data., and Market lists and stats such as 52-week highs/lows, analyst upgrades/downgrades, and dividend pages..