FX Replay vs QuantRocket comparison

FX Replay focuses on Backtesting, Paper Trading, and Data Visualizations while QuantRocket specializes in Screeners, Quant, and Backtesting. They overlap in 2 categories, so choose based on your preferred workflow and pricing.

Good news—both FX Replay and QuantRocket offer free plans. You can try each platform without commitment and only pay when you need premium features.

QuantRocket provides API access for programmatic data retrieval and custom integrations. FX Replay doesn't currently offer an API, so you'll need to use their web interface.

Choose FX Replay if you need Manual backtesting & bar replay with 1‑minute data across assets; seconds timeframes available for some FX and futures symbols., and Data sources: Dukascopy & OANDA for FX; CME for futures.. Go with QuantRocket if Includes survivorship-bias-free US minute-bar data (from 2007 onward) for Zipline backtests and live trading, with optional real-time feeds from brokers like IBKR and Alpaca., and Supports point-in-time screening and ranking pipelines, and integrates with Alphalens and Pyfolio for in-notebook analysis inside Jupyter. better fits how you invest.

Both cover Currencies, and Futures. FX Replay also includes Commodities, and Cryptos. QuantRocket adds coverage for Stocks, ETFs, and Options.

QuantRocket offers real-time data feeds, which is essential for active traders. FX Replay uses delayed or end-of-day data, which works fine for longer-term investors who don't need up-to-the-second quotes.

QuantRocket supports data exports to CSV, and JSON. FX Replay has more limited export options.

QuantRocket connects with brokers for portfolio syncing. FX Replay requires manual portfolio entry or data import.

QuantRocket includes a stock screener for finding investment ideas. FX Replay focuses on other analytical tools.